2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10121725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Geometry and Hydraulic Characteristics of Shallow Reservoirs on Sediment Entrapment

Abstract: Sediment and deposition are among the main problems in dam engineering and other related fields. Because of the numerous advantages of numerical modeling, effects of different geometries of reservoirs on the flow pattern and deposition of sediments are investigated using the finite volume based Flow-3D software package. In this study, three rectangular reservoirs with different dimensional ratios are simulated using the large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence model. To validate the numerical modeling, existing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific values obtained for probes 1 and 2 were as highlighted in Table 2. From the table, the experimental results were found to strongly agree with the numerical values with percentage error less than 5% in both parameters as highlighted, which is acceptable according to [30]. The difference may be due to mesh quality variation from the numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The specific values obtained for probes 1 and 2 were as highlighted in Table 2. From the table, the experimental results were found to strongly agree with the numerical values with percentage error less than 5% in both parameters as highlighted, which is acceptable according to [30]. The difference may be due to mesh quality variation from the numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The simulation was completed in a sufficient duration to ensure steady conditions were achieved, and then, the comparison was made. This method is similar to that of (Zahabi et al 2018):…”
Section: Verification Of Numerical Model and Laboratory Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are no outstanding differences between the results obtained with the smaller mesh size, the 2.5 mm mesh size is used to analyze the rest of the models (based on run-time considrations). The grid convergence method for selecting mesh sizes is used and inspiered by Zahani et al and Zeidi et al [21,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%