2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of gene copy number variants on personality and mood in ageing cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hardy-Weinberg test was used in this sample; however, when performing the analysis of genotypic homogeneity (genotypes C/C, C/T and T/T) vs. the four groups, (3x4), no trend was observed between the SNP rs6313 and the individuals from the different analyzed groups (F=4.517, P=0.612). In contrast to the subjects from Japan, in this population from northeastern Mexico, there was no significant genetic association found, which is explained by the close relationship between genetic factors and the environment and by its influence to cause individual differences in genes related to personality traits, cognitive skills, and specifically, bruxism (31,32). However, out of the four groups, the farthest from significance was the control group with P=0.82, unlike the combined bruxism group with P=0.10.…”
Section: Alleles -----------------------------------Groupsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The Hardy-Weinberg test was used in this sample; however, when performing the analysis of genotypic homogeneity (genotypes C/C, C/T and T/T) vs. the four groups, (3x4), no trend was observed between the SNP rs6313 and the individuals from the different analyzed groups (F=4.517, P=0.612). In contrast to the subjects from Japan, in this population from northeastern Mexico, there was no significant genetic association found, which is explained by the close relationship between genetic factors and the environment and by its influence to cause individual differences in genes related to personality traits, cognitive skills, and specifically, bruxism (31,32). However, out of the four groups, the farthest from significance was the control group with P=0.82, unlike the combined bruxism group with P=0.10.…”
Section: Alleles -----------------------------------Groupsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…There are no rare variant studies on personality, but in the only study (Power & Pluess, 2015) to estimate the heritability of all the Five-Factor Model domains using genomewide SNP data (N = 5,011), only neuroticism and openness showed significant genetic influences, suggesting that rare variants might be important. With regard to structural variants, preliminary investigations do not show an effect of large copy number variants on personality (Luciano, MacLeod et al, 2012). Additionally, by using an additive composite of personality SNP effects we may have restricted the prediction of wellbeing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…No significant genetic connections were found within the population of the study (north-eastern Mexico), which can be explained by a close connection between genetic factors plus the environment, as well as its influence on causing individual differences in genes associated with personality traits, cognitive abilities, and particularly, bruxism. 29,30 Wieckiewicz et al, showed that there are associations between SNPs within the HTRA2 gene and Bruxism episode index values. 23 The bruxism episode index increased considerably in homozygous HTR2A rs6313 TT patients compared to heterozygous patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant genetic connections were found within the population of the study (north-eastern Mexico), which can be explained by a close connection between genetic factors plus the environment, as well as its influence on causing individual differences in genes associated with personality traits, cognitive abilities, and particularly, bruxism. 29 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%