2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of gender and cigarette smoking on reactivity to psychological and pharmacological stress provocation

Abstract: We examined the influence of gender and smoking status on reactivity in two human laboratory stress paradigms. Participants were 46 (21 men, 25 women) healthy individuals who completed the Trier Social Stress Task (i.e., performed speech and math calculations in front of an audience) and a pharmacological stress provocation (i.e., administration of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH)) after an overnight hospital stay. Approximately half (53%) of the participants were smokers. Cortisol, adrenocorticotrophin … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
52
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
9
52
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings confirm the presence of a greater such risk among smokers. In relation to once-off cardiovascular reactivity, the present findings are consistent with those of Girdler et al (1997) and Back et al (2008) (for men) but inconsistent with those of Girdler et al (1997) (for women), Sheffield et al (1997) and Childs and de Wit (2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings confirm the presence of a greater such risk among smokers. In relation to once-off cardiovascular reactivity, the present findings are consistent with those of Girdler et al (1997) and Back et al (2008) (for men) but inconsistent with those of Girdler et al (1997) (for women), Sheffield et al (1997) and Childs and de Wit (2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…In laboratory studies of reactivity in smokers, some have found exaggerated cardiovascular reactivity compared to non-smokers among both men (e.g., Sheffield et al, 1997) and women (Girdler et al, 1997); others have found no differences in either men (Girdler et al, 1997;Back et al, 2008) or women (Back et al, 2008) while others have demonstrated reduced reactivity in men (Childs and de Wit, 2009). The inconsistency of these findings may be the result of methodological variations across studies, such as study-stimulated alterations of smoking behavior in the period immediately prior to laboratory testing (Primatesta et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is the absence of women in the sample. Sex differences in the cortisol response to psychological stress have been suggested (Back et al, 2008). However, there is evidence that free salivary cortisol responses were more elevated in elderly men than elderly women, but no sex differences emerged in either young adults or children (Kudielka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Исследования, выполненные с помощью внутрисосудистого ультразвука, показали, что в месте разрыва атеросклеротической бляшки у женщин содержится больше тромбов [34], а, учитывая меньший диаметр коронарных артерий [35], меньшего по размеру тромба может оказаться достаточно для развития окклюзии [30]. Другим возможным объясне-нием может быть снижение стрессоустойчивости, ко-торое у курящих женщин выражено в большей степени по сравнению с курящими мужчинами [36]. Поэтому рекомендации по прекращению курения особо важны для женщин, кроме того, у них возникает необходи-мость в более «агрессивной» медикаментозной тера-пии (антитромботической, терапии статинами, антигипертензивной).…”
Section: Smoking As a Risk Factor Of Cardiovascular Diseases курение unclassified