2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-016-2202-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Gate Lip Orientation on Bottom Pressure Coefficient of Dam Tunnel Gate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that K b values are relatively between 0.25 and 0.45 at low Y/Y o , and then all were reduced and converge to lower values as Y=Y o increases. These results are clearly different from those obtained from the current study which already based upon a constant flow rate of Q ¼ 0:035 m 3 =s ð Þ , which has a significant effect on behavior and values of (K b ), and this value is mostly different from that used by Taher [11]. Such difference in results of K b seems possible and expected and may be attributed to their different experimental conditions.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bottom Pressure Coefficient (K B )contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results showed that K b values are relatively between 0.25 and 0.45 at low Y/Y o , and then all were reduced and converge to lower values as Y=Y o increases. These results are clearly different from those obtained from the current study which already based upon a constant flow rate of Q ¼ 0:035 m 3 =s ð Þ , which has a significant effect on behavior and values of (K b ), and this value is mostly different from that used by Taher [11]. Such difference in results of K b seems possible and expected and may be attributed to their different experimental conditions.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bottom Pressure Coefficient (K B )contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar work by using only the cases of ordinary gate lips of (h = 45°and h = 55°) has been conducted by Taher [11]. Their results showed that K b values are relatively between 0.25 and 0.45 at low Y/Y o , and then all were reduced and converge to lower values as Y=Y o increases.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bottom Pressure Coefficient (K B )mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the mentioned destructive phenomena, parameters such as flow rate, velocity, water's hydrodynamic pressure, air velocity entering the flow, and water depth are effective. By measuring some of these parameters, they can be prevented from happening before failure [34]. Furthermore, due to the governing equations' nature, it is essential to start the flow analysis with fixed boundary conditions so that eventually the flow reaches a steady state after a suitable time in the model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Numerical Modeling Results With Flow-3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taher et al [17] used a random hydraulic model to study the effects of twelve gate lips orientation on the behaviour of flow and consequently on the bottom pressure coefficient. The main conclusion indicates that the values of bottom pressure coefficient (K b ) are inversely proportional to gate opening ratios (Y/Y 0 ) and range from high values with small gate openings ratios and low values for (Y/ Y 0 [ 30%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%