2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-005-9012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of gap size and associated changes in light and soil moisture on the understorey vegetation of a Hungarian beech forest

Abstract: In European beech forests windstorms often create canopy gaps and change the level of incident light, soil moisture and nutrient availability on the forest floor. Understanding the interrelations between gap size and environmental change, and the effects these have on regeneration processes is a prerequisite for developing techniques of nature-based forestry. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of gap size on the resulting spatial distributions of key abiotic environmental variables (light a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
114
1
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
15
114
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported for other spruce forests (Nilsen and Strand, 2008;Vranova et al, 2009) and other forest ecosystems (Brumme, 1995;Sullivan et al, 2008;Tang et al, 2005b). Reductions in R s rate by forest thinning are linked to thinninginduced changes in microclimate (Galhidy et al, 2006;Gray et al, 2002), substrate availability (Selig et al, 2008;Zu et al, 2009), soil microbes (Arunachalam and Arunachalam, 2000;Zhang and Zak, 1998), and fine roots (Peng and Thomas, 2006;Tang et al, 2005b).…”
Section: The Effect Of Thinning On R S Ratesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been reported for other spruce forests (Nilsen and Strand, 2008;Vranova et al, 2009) and other forest ecosystems (Brumme, 1995;Sullivan et al, 2008;Tang et al, 2005b). Reductions in R s rate by forest thinning are linked to thinninginduced changes in microclimate (Galhidy et al, 2006;Gray et al, 2002), substrate availability (Selig et al, 2008;Zu et al, 2009), soil microbes (Arunachalam and Arunachalam, 2000;Zhang and Zak, 1998), and fine roots (Peng and Thomas, 2006;Tang et al, 2005b).…”
Section: The Effect Of Thinning On R S Ratesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In the terrestrial ecosystem, R s rate is profoundly influenced by both biotic 2010). Thinning may affect R s rate by influencing root biomass (Brumme, 1995;Peng and Thomas, 2006;Tang et al, 2005b), soil microclimate (Galhidy et al, 2006;Gray et al, 2002;Pang et al, 2013), belowground C allocation (Selig et al, 2008;Tian et al, 2010;Zu et al, 2009), and microbial community structure (Arunachalam and Arunachalam, 2000;Zhang and Zak, 1998;Zu et al, 2009). Thinning may cause the immediate decrease in R s rate due to the decrease in respiration from tree roots (Tang et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manninger (2008) states that there are differences in absolute value of soil moisture in the gaps and in the surrounding closed forest, but the directions and values of change are similar. Gálhidy et al (2006) claim there are no significant soil moisture differences in a small or large gap, but the values in a large gap are more diverse. Moreover, soil moisture was higher in gaps than it was under a closed stand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Csépányi (2008) shows several examples for oak regeneration and proposes how to choose the required gap size, shape, and bearing. Gálhidy et al (2005Gálhidy et al ( , 2006 makes intensive studies in beech stands. Török (2006) fully assays the methods of exposure-orientated regeneration in beech forests; however, such a detailed work does not exist for oaks yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap size depends on the number of harvested or fallen trees and alters ecological conditions of created microclimate (Denslow, Hartshorn 1994;lowman, rinker 2004;ritter et al 2005;Galhidy et al 2006). tree species have different ecological demands and their response differs due to the gap size (naaf, Wulf 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%