Emissions From Continuous Combustion Systems 1972
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-1998-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Fuel Injection Method on Gas Turbine Combustor Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeCorso, ref. (2),observed an increase in mean drop size with an increase in air pressure and this was confirmed by Maya and Sato, ref.…”
Section: Dropsize Measurementssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DeCorso, ref. (2),observed an increase in mean drop size with an increase in air pressure and this was confirmed by Maya and Sato, ref.…”
Section: Dropsize Measurementssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It may be argued that in view of the vastly superior combustion-pollution performance of the airblast and vaporizing type of fuel injection systems (see refs. (2) and (3)), pressure atomizers need no further serious investigations. However, considerable interest still remains in them due to the very large number of pressure atomizers that are still in service today.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak flame temperature will vary almost linearly with combustor inlet temperature which, therefore, can be presumed a very important index of NO formation. This has been repeatedly documented in recent papers (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Here the simple-cycle engine has a very major potential ad- vantage over regenerated or recuperated gas turbines, particularly at low power where the bulk of the fuel is consumed in automobile applications.…”
Section: Potential For Low Emissionssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…10 in reference (15) and Fig. 12 in reference (16)]. The data from these reports has been nondimensionalized and plotted in Fig. 14.…”
Section: Potential For Low Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems of soot and smoke are always most severe at high pressures. There are several reasons for this, some of which derive from chemical effects, while others stem from physical factors which affect spray characteristics and hence also the distribution of mixture strength in the soot-generating regions of the flame [38,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Smokementioning
confidence: 99%