2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0217979215502513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of frustration and cyclic exchange on the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet within the self-consistent spin-wave theory

Abstract: The relevance of the quasi-two-dimensional spin-1/2 frustrated quantum antiferromagnet due to its possibility of modelling the high-temperature superconducting parent compounds has resulted in numerous theoretical and experimental studies. This paper presents a detailed research of the influence of the varying exchange interactions on the model magnetic properties within the framework of self-consistent spin-wave theory based on Dyson-Maleev representation. Beside the nearest neighbour interaction within the p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The horizontal line at Ω(q)/J = 1 indicates the spin-wave excitation energy at M point in the purely triangular case with J c = J = 0. also reduced from ∼ 1.6J to ∼ 1.05J as J /J is increased. A similar dependence of the excitation energy on the interaction parameter J has been found also in the square lattice with the linear spin-wave theory [40].…”
Section: Spin-wave Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The horizontal line at Ω(q)/J = 1 indicates the spin-wave excitation energy at M point in the purely triangular case with J c = J = 0. also reduced from ∼ 1.6J to ∼ 1.05J as J /J is increased. A similar dependence of the excitation energy on the interaction parameter J has been found also in the square lattice with the linear spin-wave theory [40].…”
Section: Spin-wave Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These exchange interactions can be considered as an introduction of the charge fluctuation [16,17] and thus become more relevant for describing magnetic properties of Mott insulators in proximity of the metal-insulator transition [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. While the ring-exchange interaction itself has long been considered for describing the magnetism in the three-dimensional solid 3 He [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], NiS 2 [35], and the parent compounds of high-T c cuprate superconductor such as La 2 CuO 4 [36][37][38][39][40][41], its importance in triangular-lattice systems near Mott transition is attracting a renewed attention recently [14,15,42,43] in organic Mott insulators κ-(ET) 2 Cu 2 (CN) 3 [44][45][46] and EtMe 3 Sb[Pd(dmit) 2 ] 2 [47,48], and a charge-density-wave Mott insulator 1T -TaS 2 [49,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention to thoroughly analyze the influence of the in-plane frustration on the magnetic properties of the system is * milica.rutonjski@df.uns.ac.rs corroborated by the fact that frustration is strongly pronounced in two-dimensional quantum magnets [17,18], though it is often not taken into account [5,6,8]. Our earlier results [19][20][21][22] also suggest that the model with the NNN interaction gives predictions in better agreement with the experimental data. Beside the aforementioned, the choice of the dominant interactions is supported by the fact that these interactions, especially NN, NNN and DM interaction, but also spin anisotropy to a lesser extent, show a distinctive pressure dependence [23,24], enabling one to affect the phase transition temperature by applying high pressures on the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The intention to thoroughly analyze the influence of in‐plane frustration on the magnetic properties of the system is corroborated by the fact that frustration is strongly pronounced in 2D quantum magnets, [ 17,18 ] though it is often not taken into account. [ 5,6,8 ] Our earlier results [ 19–22 ] also suggest that the model with the NNN interaction gives predictions in better agreement with the experimental data. Besides the aforementioned, the choice of the dominant interactions is supported by the fact that these interactions, especially NN, NNN, and DM interaction, but also spin anisotropy to a lesser extent, show a distinctive pressure dependence, [ 23,24 ] enabling one to affect the phase transition temperature by applying high pressures on the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%