“…Among the 50 articles included in this review, 35 articles had a cross-sectional design [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ], four were cross-over studies [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ], seven were of longitudinal design [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ], two were cohort studies [ 77 , 78 ], one article had both a longitudinal and cross-sectional design [ 79 ] and one article had both a cross-over and cross-sectional design [ 28 ] ( Table 1 ). For physical activity, 14 articles were cross-sectional […”