2006
DOI: 10.5194/bg-3-479-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of free atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment (FACE), N fertilization and poplar genotype on the physical protection of carbon in the mineral soil of a polar plantation after five years

Abstract: Abstract. Free air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments in aggrading forests and plantations have demonstrated significant increases in net primary production (NPP) and C storage in forest vegetation. The extra C uptake may also be stored in forest floor litter and in forest soil. After five years of FACE treatment at the EuroFACE short rotation poplar plantation, the increase of total soil C% was larger under elevated than under ambient CO 2 . However, the fate of this additional C allocated belowground remains… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these studies did not report changes in soil carbon, which may or may not change in the same way as the above ground biomass. The study most similar to our work was that by Hoosbeek et al (2006), who reported that Populus euramericana showed 31% higher C in the 250 to 1,000-μm soil fraction, than two other poplar species at age 5; differences were presumably due to greater SOC protection through formation of microaggregates.…”
Section: Variablesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, these studies did not report changes in soil carbon, which may or may not change in the same way as the above ground biomass. The study most similar to our work was that by Hoosbeek et al (2006), who reported that Populus euramericana showed 31% higher C in the 250 to 1,000-μm soil fraction, than two other poplar species at age 5; differences were presumably due to greater SOC protection through formation of microaggregates.…”
Section: Variablesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the dynamic behaviour of biological binding agents was only partly explained by the initial quality of the organic materials . Other studies by physical fractionation of soil samples collected after 5 yr of treatment at the POP-EuroFACE experiment revealed that the effect on aggregate formation due to FACE was dependent on plant species, and FACE increased the micro-aggregates within macro-aggregates (iM-microaggregate) weight and C fractions (Hoosbeek et al 2006), which was similar to our results. Recently, the primary effects of litter added to soil on the decomposition of original organic matter in soil and macro-aggregate dispersal have also been the focus of attention (Hoosbeek and Scarascia-Mugnozza 2009).…”
Section: Carbon:nitrogen Ratios In Soil Fractions Of Different Sizessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Tellingly, the choice of species may strongly affect the C sequestration capacity of a forest ecosystem (Hoosbeek et al ., 2006b; Hyvönen et al ., 2007). The three poplar species planted at the POP/EUROFACE experiment performed equally well when growing in an abundance of nutrients, sunlight and water, and produced very large amounts of woody biomass for potential use as biofuel.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%