Effects of footwear on three-dimensional tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during running

Peltz, Cathryn D.; Haladik, Jeffrey A.; Hoffman, Scott E.; McDonald, Michael; Ramo, Nicole L.; Divine, George; Nurse, Matthew A.; Bey, Michael J.

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.016

Cited by 36 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most ankle DF studies have been quasi-static [10][11][12][13][14], and none have validated the dynamic accuracy [10][11][12][13][14][15]. While we cannot directly compare our validation results to prior work, our data are similar to an ankle DF validation study conducted under quasi-static loading ( Table 1).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

“…The risk to benefit ratio of utilizing DF and MBT should be carefully assessed. M a n u s c r i p t 15 In conclusion, we demonstrated that DF and MBT can accurately quantify tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics during dynamic motions. By visualizing what may be subtle differences in tibiotalar kinematics and bone-to-bone distance, we believe DF and MBT will serve as a valuable tool to study ankle pathomechanics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…While we cannot directly compare our validation results to prior work, our data are similar to an ankle DF validation study conducted under quasi-static loading ( Table 1). Statistics were not used to compare contributions of the subtalar and tibiotalar to the overall arc of motion at the ankle, but results from the feasibility study are comparable to the literature (S -Table 5) [12,15]. For the volunteer, the mean change in subtalar inversion/eversion during toe-off in our subject was approximately five times that of the tibiotalar joint (15.51±3.80° versus 3.82±1.28°), strengthening the belief that the subtalar joint is primarily responsible for this motion as previously postulated (e.g., Yamaguchi et al) [7,12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Although two dynamic ankle studies have been performed using DF [14,15], the dynamic accuracy was not reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The average tibiotalar displacement for the volunteer ranged from 0.39±0.06-0.61±0.25 mm during heel-strike and 0.82±0.28-0.89±0.38 mm during toe-off (S-Table 5). Average subtalar displacement ranged from 0.83±0.44-1.34±0 15. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationship between altered tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics and development of ankle osteoarthritis is unknown, as skin marker motion analysis cannot measure articulations of each joint independently. Here, we quantified the accuracy and demonstrated the feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy (DF) to measure and visualize the three-dimensional articulation (i.e., arthrokinematics) of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Metal beads were implanted in the tibia, talus and calcaneus of two cadavers. Three-dimensional surface models of the cadaver and volunteer bones were reconstructed from computed tomography images. A custom DF system was positioned adjacent to an instrumented treadmill. DF images of the cadavers were acquired during maximal rotation about three axes (dorsal-plantar flexion, inversion-eversion, internal-external rotation) and simulated gait (treadmill at 0.5 and 1.0 m/s). Positions of implanted beads were tracked using dynamic radiostereometric analysis (DRSA). Bead locations were also calculated using model-based markerless tracking (MBT) and compared, along with joint angles and translations, to DRSA results. The mean positional difference between DRSA and MBT for all frames defined bias; standard deviation of the difference defined precision. The volunteer was imaged with DF during treadmill gait. From these movements, joint kinematics and tibiotalar and subtalar bone-to-bone distance were calculated. The mean positional and rotational bias (±standard deviation) of MBT was 0.03±0.35 mm and 0.25±0.81°, respectively. Mean translational and rotational precision was 0.30±0.12 mm and 0.63±0.28°, respectively. With excellent measurement accuracy, DF and MBT may elucidate the kinematic pathways responsible for osteoarthritis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in living subjects.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Although two dynamic ankle studies have been performed using DF [14,15], the dynamic accuracy was not reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Biomechanics of the Ankle

Hunt

Baldin

D’Hooghe

et al. 2021

Lateral Ankle Instability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Vivo Ankle Kinematics Revealed Through Biplane Radiography: Current Concepts, Recent Literature, and Future Directions

Canton

Anderst

Hogan

2020

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Lateral ligament repair, specifically the modified Broström-Gould (BG) procedure, has been described for patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) after failure of nonoperative management. However, there is minimal data about native in vivo ankle bone kinematics and how repairs such as the BG procedure affect the kinematics. The objective of this review is to appraise existing literature that used biplane radiography to measure in vivo kinematics of the ankle in healthy, CAI, and BG populations.Recent Findings Results showed that the tibiotalar joint contributes more to dorsi/plantarflexion, the subtalar joint contributes more to inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation, and that both joints are capable of complex three-dimensional (3D) motion. Preliminary data suggests that demanding activities (as opposed to walking) are necessary to elicit kinematic differences between healthy and CAI populations. Results also indicate that the BG procedure restores static kinematics and range of motion. All but one of the studies identified in this review collected static, quasi-stance, or partial gait capture data. Summary The strength of our current knowledge is low given the small sample sizes, exploratory nature of previous work, and lack of rigorous experimental design in previous studies. Future directions include development of an improved protocol for establishing coordinate systems in the ankle bones, continued development of a database of normal kinematics during a variety of activities, and large-scale, longitudinal studies of CAI and BG patients.

show abstract

Effects of footwear on three-dimensional tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during running

Cited by 36 publications

References 20 publications

Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics

Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics

Biomechanics of the Ankle

In Vivo Ankle Kinematics Revealed Through Biplane Radiography: Current Concepts, Recent Literature, and Future Directions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About