2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fluorescent dyes, quenchers, and dangling ends on DNA duplex stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
122
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also observed that beyond 3.5 mM concentration of MgCl 2 no amplification was observed (Table 1). Our findings were in accordance with the results of Moreira et al, [21] who reported that too much MgCl 2 is equally deleterious in most cases. In the case of excess Mg 2+ , the usual effect is a substantial increase in Table 1 Effect of different concentration of MgCl 2 on the specificity of the goat specific primer G. secondary products' formation by non-specific priming.…”
Section: Standardisation Of Pcr Conditions To Increase the Specificitsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It was also observed that beyond 3.5 mM concentration of MgCl 2 no amplification was observed (Table 1). Our findings were in accordance with the results of Moreira et al, [21] who reported that too much MgCl 2 is equally deleterious in most cases. In the case of excess Mg 2+ , the usual effect is a substantial increase in Table 1 Effect of different concentration of MgCl 2 on the specificity of the goat specific primer G. secondary products' formation by non-specific priming.…”
Section: Standardisation Of Pcr Conditions To Increase the Specificitsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A complexometric assay (34) was employed to verify Mg 2+ concentrations in each lot of the buffer. EDTA titrations showed that magnesium concentrations deviated less than 2% from expected values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitution into the FreeSRF relationship, ρ pred = χ model β exp C, yields Eq. 7: ρ c = 78.1 RIU mM × 1,055,663 milliradians RIU × CðMÞ, [7] which allows the ρ c at each ligand concentration to be calculated.…”
Section: Conformation and Hydration Changes Are The Origin Of Free-somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label-free chemical and biochemical investigations (5, 6) transduce the desired signal without an exogenous label (fluorescent, radioactive, or otherwise) representing an essential step toward this goal. Many label-free methods require one of the interacting species to be either tethered or immobilized to the sensor surface, introducing a potential perturbation to the natural state of the species (7,8). However, back-scattering interferometry (BSI) is a free-solution label-free technique with the added benefit of sensitivity that rivals fluorescence (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%