1996
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2126(95)00106-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fludarabine and gemcitabine on human acute myeloid leukemia cell line HL 60: Direct comparison of cytotoxicity and cellular Ara-C uptake enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Somewhat analogous to the concept of non-chemo-therapeutic resistant cancer cell types, the cytotoxic anti-neoplatic potency of gemcibatine-(C 4 - amide )-[anti-HER2/ neu ] and gemcitabine-(C 5 methylcarbamate )-[anti-HER2/ neu ] could also have alternatively been measured against an entirely different neoplastic cell type such as pancreatic carcinoma, [95] small-cell lung carcinoma, [96] neuroblastoma, [97] or leukemia/lymphoid [60,98] populations due to their relatively higher gemcitabine sensitivity. Similarly, human promyelocytic leukemia, [40,60] T-4 lymphoblastoid clones, [60] glioblastoma, [40,60] cervical epitheliod carcinoma, [60] colon adenocarci-noma, [60] pancreatic adenocarcinoma, [60] pulmonary adenocarcinoma, [60] oral squamous cell carcinoma, [60] and prostatic carcinoma [21] have all been found to be sensitive to gemcitabine and gemcitabine-(oxyether phopholipid) covalently bonded chemotherapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somewhat analogous to the concept of non-chemo-therapeutic resistant cancer cell types, the cytotoxic anti-neoplatic potency of gemcibatine-(C 4 - amide )-[anti-HER2/ neu ] and gemcitabine-(C 5 methylcarbamate )-[anti-HER2/ neu ] could also have alternatively been measured against an entirely different neoplastic cell type such as pancreatic carcinoma, [95] small-cell lung carcinoma, [96] neuroblastoma, [97] or leukemia/lymphoid [60,98] populations due to their relatively higher gemcitabine sensitivity. Similarly, human promyelocytic leukemia, [40,60] T-4 lymphoblastoid clones, [60] glioblastoma, [40,60] cervical epitheliod carcinoma, [60] colon adenocarci-noma, [60] pancreatic adenocarcinoma, [60] pulmonary adenocarcinoma, [60] oral squamous cell carcinoma, [60] and prostatic carcinoma [21] have all been found to be sensitive to gemcitabine and gemcitabine-(oxyether phopholipid) covalently bonded chemotherapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary results for the combination of dFdC and cisplatin also suggest possible therapeutic synergism in non-small-cell lung cancer (18). Furthermore, numerous investigators have reported promising results of dFdC used in combination with udarabine (Fara-A) on human AML cell line HL-60 and on freshly isolated CLL cells in vitro (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the cytotoxic anti-neoplatic potency of gemcibatine-(C 4 - amide )-[anti-HER2/ neu ] could also have alternatively been measured against an entirely diferent neoplastic cell type such as pancreatic carcinoma [52] small-cell lung carcinoma [53] neuroblastoma, [54] or leukemia/lymphoid [55,56] due to their relatively higher gemcitabine sensitivity. In addition, human promyelocytic leukemia [24,55], T-4 lymphoblastoid clones [55], glioblastoma [24,55], cervical epitheliod carcinoma [55], colon adenocarcinoma [55], pancreatic adenocarcinoma [55], pulmonary adenocarcinoma [55], oral squamous cell carcinoma [55], and prostatic carcinoma [57] have been found to be sensitive to gemcitabine and covalent gemcitabine-(oxyether phopholipid) preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%