2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of flow pattern, device and formulation on particle size distribution of nebulized aerosol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of nebulization products, the combination consists of the nebulizer and the drug formulation. Both components account for efficacy by determining the availability (disposition) of the active substance [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The major barriers created by this combination derive from the fact that the manufacturers belong to different industrial sectors, i.e., the mechanical and the pharmaceutical industry [12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of nebulization products, the combination consists of the nebulizer and the drug formulation. Both components account for efficacy by determining the availability (disposition) of the active substance [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The major barriers created by this combination derive from the fact that the manufacturers belong to different industrial sectors, i.e., the mechanical and the pharmaceutical industry [12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, since we believe that the dead volume of the nebulization cup has a great impact; different models or brands of nebulization devices with different dead volumes or different properties may produce different results in terms of aerosol parameters. Several studies have demonstrated that different nebulizer cups affect the character of the produced aerosol significantly, not only because of the dead volume but also because of the design and construction [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of VMNs are: (i) low drug losses, (ii) narrow droplet size distribution in the aerosol cloud, and (iii) high predicted lung deposition [ 10 ]. However, there are still not too many pre-clinical and clinical studies of BUD micro-suspensions delivered from VMNs indexed in the PubMed database [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and many of such results are available only as abstracts and short communications [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The important difference in nebulizing BUD is that physicochemical properties of steroid suspensions are different from typical drugs available as solutions [ 18 ], and a thorough recognition and understanding of this process are needed to optimize the pharmacological recommendations, especially when using VMNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%