2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9048(03)00190-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of five nights of normobaric hypoxia on the ventilatory responses to acute hypoxia and hypercapnia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
22
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased AHVR (via an increase in breathing frequency) within the placebo condition is similar to previous reports [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Although the mechanism is incompletely understood, oxidative stress has been proposed to be a primary mediator, as antioxidant treatment before [20] and during [18] IH exposure prevents carotid body sensory long-term facilitation and the enhanced chemosensory response to hypoxia [20] as well as augmentation of the AHVR [3,18].…”
Section: Ahvr and Ahcvrsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The increased AHVR (via an increase in breathing frequency) within the placebo condition is similar to previous reports [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Although the mechanism is incompletely understood, oxidative stress has been proposed to be a primary mediator, as antioxidant treatment before [20] and during [18] IH exposure prevents carotid body sensory long-term facilitation and the enhanced chemosensory response to hypoxia [20] as well as augmentation of the AHVR [3,18].…”
Section: Ahvr and Ahcvrsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…An increased AHCVR following IH has been reported previously [11][12][13], but is not a consistent observation, with shorter duration IH studies reporting no change [8,15]. Thus, the unchanged AHCVR within the placebo and nonselective COX inhibition conditions following the 6-h IH exposure are consistent with previous studies using more acute IH exposures [8,15].…”
Section: Ahvr and Ahcvrsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Others have suggested that individual difference in the tolerance to hypoxia may be explained by an increased Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) incidence [12], which subsequently affects training and adaptation and ultimately performance. In short, the differentiation between responders and non-responders is probably based on many factors including genetic predisposition [13], automatic nervous system adaptation [14], hypoxia-induced ventilator drive [15], underlying individual fitness levels, fatigue recovery and motivation [16]. It is clear that there is considerable individual variation in the physiological responses of athletes using altitude training, which makes the prediction of responders and non-responders very difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%