2014
DOI: 10.9790/487x-16548695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Firm Size on Enterprise Risk Management of Listed Firms in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao, Hwang and Low (2013) developed an enterprise risk management maturity model (ERMMM) consisting of 16 important ERM maturity criteria and presented 66 applicable best practices under these criteria and this can be applied in companies to measure maturity and identify areas of improvement. ERM studies such as Wanjohi and Ombui (2013); Yegon, Mouni and Wanjau (2014), Waweru and Kisaka (2012) have been conducted in the financial market of Kenya and mainly cover banking institutions and listed companies and only a few cover the insurance sector. Furthermore, the maturity of ERM has not been tested in the studies that have measured the value of ERM implementation.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao, Hwang and Low (2013) developed an enterprise risk management maturity model (ERMMM) consisting of 16 important ERM maturity criteria and presented 66 applicable best practices under these criteria and this can be applied in companies to measure maturity and identify areas of improvement. ERM studies such as Wanjohi and Ombui (2013); Yegon, Mouni and Wanjau (2014), Waweru and Kisaka (2012) have been conducted in the financial market of Kenya and mainly cover banking institutions and listed companies and only a few cover the insurance sector. Furthermore, the maturity of ERM has not been tested in the studies that have measured the value of ERM implementation.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chandrapala and Knapkova (2013) stated that even though all firms operate in the same industry and interact with same external variables, their financial performances are not the same as a number of internal factors could be responsible for firm performance such as firm size, age, debt ratio, quick ratio, inventory level, sales growth physical capital intensity and capital turnover as suggested by Pavelkova and Knápková (2009). Yegon, Mouni and Wanjau (2014) citing Kamar, Rajan and Zingales (2001) suggested that what determines a firm size is the ownership of physical assets which are critical resources. The neoclassical theory of firm size supported by Lucas (1978) also looked at the firm size in terms of per capita capital in form of investment return and research and development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of Yegon, Mouni and Wanjau (2014), citing Kajola (2008), suggested that what determines a firm size is the ownership of physical assets which are critical resources. This found that sales and assets are not specifically the appropriate methods of measurement for size; the important factor would be how agency transactions and the range of costs influence profits.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%