2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of filling fluid type and composition and joint orientation on acoustic wave propagation across individual fluid-filled rock joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that the increase of the joint thickness could cause more wave attenuation, while the increase in the water content could lead to less wave attenuation. Their further investigation indicated that the type of filling liquids in rock joints also played an important role in the seismic responses of jointed rock masses [27]. Huang et al [28] performed a series of dynamic tests investigating stress wave propagation through a liquid-filled rock joint under undrained conditions, and they found a negative correlation between the peak water pressure value and the transmission coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the increase of the joint thickness could cause more wave attenuation, while the increase in the water content could lead to less wave attenuation. Their further investigation indicated that the type of filling liquids in rock joints also played an important role in the seismic responses of jointed rock masses [27]. Huang et al [28] performed a series of dynamic tests investigating stress wave propagation through a liquid-filled rock joint under undrained conditions, and they found a negative correlation between the peak water pressure value and the transmission coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In particular, the alteration of the flow characteristics in fractured formations can be monitored using seismic waves as high-resolution probes, sensitive to different geological conditions such as temperature, overburden and pore pressures, saturation level, and depth of interest. [16][17][18][19] As seismic waves propagate through a fractured medium, frequency-dependent elastic interface waves are generated, which are categorized into fast and slow interface waves with velocities ranging from shear-wave (upper limit) to Rayleigh-wave (lower limit). [20][21][22][23] While the energy of these interface waves depends on stress states and fracture geometry, 21,24 a direct relationship exists between fracture-specific stiffness and propagation of interface waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%