The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Fibre Reinforcement on Liquefaction Behaviour of Poorly Graded Sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liquefaction is a catastrophic phenomenon in geotechnical engineering and occurs mostly in loose sands, sandy silts and tailings. Under undrained cyclic loading, soil element tests show that fibre reinforcement increases the liquefaction resistance of sand, demonstrated by the increasing number of load cycles required to cause liquefaction [8][9][10]. Shaking table tests on fibre reinforced sand give a similar conclusion, showing that fibre inclusions decrease the peak excess pore water pressure during shaking and delay the occurrence of softening and liquefaction [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Liquefaction is a catastrophic phenomenon in geotechnical engineering and occurs mostly in loose sands, sandy silts and tailings. Under undrained cyclic loading, soil element tests show that fibre reinforcement increases the liquefaction resistance of sand, demonstrated by the increasing number of load cycles required to cause liquefaction [8][9][10]. Shaking table tests on fibre reinforced sand give a similar conclusion, showing that fibre inclusions decrease the peak excess pore water pressure during shaking and delay the occurrence of softening and liquefaction [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If Figures 4-6 were interpreted amongst themselves, the relative density was found the dominating factor among other variables such as ber length and ber ratio. It was seen that the maximum CSR values were obtained for specimens with 12 mm bers and compacted to a relative density of 70%, resulting in the maximum resistance to liquefaction cycles [19,20].…”
Section: E Ect Of Relative Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens with a relative density of 70% were prepared, and empirical equations to determine peak and residual strength based on cement content, ber content, and con ning pressure were proposed in Consoli et al [4] and Consoli et al [14]. e resistance to liquefaction in ber-reinforced soils increased the number of cycles required to cause liquefaction under undrained loading conditions [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Cyclic triaxial test results have indicated that the shear modulus of reinforced soil is not only under the control of shear strain, but also under the control of many factors such as ber content, loading repetition, and con ning pressure [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that resistance of sand deposits liquefaction could be considerably increased with geosynthetic reinforcement [28]. Besides conventional reinforcing techniques such as geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth, using randomly distributed fibers as reinforcement material has gained more popularity because of more acceptable performance [2,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that reinforced samples did not exhibit initial liquefaction as compared to unreinforced samples, although resistance against liquefaction increased with the inclusion of fibers [27]. Eskisar et al [29] found that there is a direct relationship between the loading cycles number and the generation of excess PWP in reinforced sand. Krishnaswamy and Thomas Isaac [5] performed triaxial tests to assess the liquefaction potential of reinforced sand by geotextile, including coir fibers and woven and nonwoven types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%