2012
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.58.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feeding Mediterranean buffalo sorghum silage versus maize silage on the rumen microbiota and milk fatty acid content

Abstract: Sorghum presents a sustainable feedstock for Mediterranean buffaloes due to its reduced water and nitrogen requirements compared with maize, which is currently fed primarily. We investigated the effects of feeding sorghum as opposed to maize on Mediterranean buffalo rumen microbial diversity and milk fatty acid content. Four cannulated lactating Mediterranean buffalo cows were fed a basal diet for one month before switching either to maize or sorghum-silage based diets for a 3-month period. Buffaloes were then… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been employed to study the rumen microbiome ranging from classical cultivation (Bryant, 1959 ; Hungate et al, 1964 ) to molecular approaches including next generation sequencing (Edwards et al, 2004 ; Mackie and Cann, 2005 ; Creevey et al, 2014 ) and functional metagenomics (Brulc et al, 2009 ; Hess et al, 2011 ; Ferrer et al, 2012 ) as well as metabolomics (Ametaj et al, 2010 ; Saleem et al, 2013 ). Furthermore, investigations of diet induced shifts in microbial community composition of the rumen in different contexts are numerous (Tajima et al, 2001 ; Fernando et al, 2010 ; Kong et al, 2010 ; Pitta et al, 2010 ; de Menezes et al, 2011 ; Ann Huws et al, 2012 ; Belanche et al, 2012 ; Carberry et al, 2012 ; Petri et al, 2013 ; Thoetkiattikul et al, 2013 ; Zhang et al, 2013 ; Lengowski et al, 2016 ) but generally rumen studies are restricted to nucleic acids-based approaches with limited functional insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been employed to study the rumen microbiome ranging from classical cultivation (Bryant, 1959 ; Hungate et al, 1964 ) to molecular approaches including next generation sequencing (Edwards et al, 2004 ; Mackie and Cann, 2005 ; Creevey et al, 2014 ) and functional metagenomics (Brulc et al, 2009 ; Hess et al, 2011 ; Ferrer et al, 2012 ) as well as metabolomics (Ametaj et al, 2010 ; Saleem et al, 2013 ). Furthermore, investigations of diet induced shifts in microbial community composition of the rumen in different contexts are numerous (Tajima et al, 2001 ; Fernando et al, 2010 ; Kong et al, 2010 ; Pitta et al, 2010 ; de Menezes et al, 2011 ; Ann Huws et al, 2012 ; Belanche et al, 2012 ; Carberry et al, 2012 ; Petri et al, 2013 ; Thoetkiattikul et al, 2013 ; Zhang et al, 2013 ; Lengowski et al, 2016 ) but generally rumen studies are restricted to nucleic acids-based approaches with limited functional insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%