1994
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90094-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fat content, weight, and acceptability of the meal on postlunch changes in mood, performance, and cardiovascular function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feelings of tension and anxiety (POMS) declined throughout the study while subjects consumed the medium-fat diet, but not in subjects eating the low-fat diet, suggesting that effects of the low-fat diet masked the usual decline in feelings of tension and anxiety as the study progressed. The data from the present study are consistent with the previous observation that human volunteers felt more relaxed and friendly and less tense and antagonistic following high-fat meals than they did after low-fat meals (Smith et al 19946;Wells & Read, 1996). Similarly, the difference in feelings of anger and hostility between the groups in the present study supports recent reports that monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) are more aggressive and spend less time in passive body contact or within touching distance of each other when they are fed on a low-fat diet than they do when they are fed on a high-fat diet (Kaplan er aZ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Feelings of tension and anxiety (POMS) declined throughout the study while subjects consumed the medium-fat diet, but not in subjects eating the low-fat diet, suggesting that effects of the low-fat diet masked the usual decline in feelings of tension and anxiety as the study progressed. The data from the present study are consistent with the previous observation that human volunteers felt more relaxed and friendly and less tense and antagonistic following high-fat meals than they did after low-fat meals (Smith et al 19946;Wells & Read, 1996). Similarly, the difference in feelings of anger and hostility between the groups in the present study supports recent reports that monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) are more aggressive and spend less time in passive body contact or within touching distance of each other when they are fed on a low-fat diet than they do when they are fed on a high-fat diet (Kaplan er aZ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our subjects scored best for all tasks of the combi-test after the fat meal. This finding is in line with the higher accuracy of a focused attention task after a high-fat meal compared with a low-fat meal reported by others (Smith et al 1994). We also recorded better accuracy in short-term memory as well as a lower error rate for the choice RT after carbohydrate than after protein ingestion, whereas the opposite was true for the central efficiency as well as for the accuracy in peripheral attention.…”
Section: Objective Performancesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We also recorded better accuracy in short-term memory as well as a lower error rate for the choice RT after carbohydrate than after protein ingestion, whereas the opposite was true for the central efficiency as well as for the accuracy in peripheral attention. This finding is consistent with the suggested trade-off between accuracy and efficiency (Pollitt et al 1981;Spring et al 1982;Smith et al 1994), i.e. between the qualitative or quantitative indices to evaluate a cognitive task, and the trade-off between central and peripheral performance (Smith et al 1988).…”
Section: Objective Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Addition and sentence verification tasks are not affected by missing breakfast (Dickie & Bender, 1982;Smith & Kendrick, 1992;Smith et al 1994a). Smith et al (1994b ) showed that a high-fat lunch did not affect logical reasoning. In comparison with performance after a diet soft-drink (containing aspartame), subjects solved more arithmetic problems in a shorter time after consuming calorie-containing yoghurts (Kanarek & Swinney, 1990).…”
Section: Effects Of Foods On Cognitive Performancementioning
confidence: 93%