2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fat and exoskeletal mass on the mass scaling of metabolism in Carabidae beetles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, SC models, including DEB theory [85,156] are supported by the positive allometry of fat mass in mammals [17], and of 'dead wood' in plants [28,29], but they are contradicted by the isometry of fat and skeletal tissues in insects [157,197] (see also Section 2.2.1). Furthermore, a study designed to test SC effects showed that hypometric metabolic scaling is not caused by a positive allometry of either fat or exoskeletal materials in 15 species of carabid beetles [198]. In fact, both fat and exoskeletal masses showed negative allometry, the opposite of that predicted.…”
Section: System-composition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, SC models, including DEB theory [85,156] are supported by the positive allometry of fat mass in mammals [17], and of 'dead wood' in plants [28,29], but they are contradicted by the isometry of fat and skeletal tissues in insects [157,197] (see also Section 2.2.1). Furthermore, a study designed to test SC effects showed that hypometric metabolic scaling is not caused by a positive allometry of either fat or exoskeletal materials in 15 species of carabid beetles [198]. In fact, both fat and exoskeletal masses showed negative allometry, the opposite of that predicted.…”
Section: System-composition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, changes in adult size are also commonly involved in the plasticity of organisms' developmental responses to environmental conditions [9][10][11][12]. Such high variability in the size of organisms has long inspired scientific debate [13][14][15][16], mainly because the size achieved at maturity is a fundamental determinant of Darwinian fitness [17,18], with far-reaching consequences for physiological and ecological processes, e.g. the energy budget, mortality, competition and niche breadth [13,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the energy budget, mortality, competition and niche breadth [13,17]. Mechanistically, this variability involves changes in cell numbers and size as well as the amount of extracellular components, but we usually do not know the role of each of these mechanisms or their fitness consequences [8,13,18]. Emerging evidence suggests that cell size does not remain constant, changing both with the developmental environment [12,[19][20][21][22][23] and over evolution, differentiating populations and species [19,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, changes in adult size are also commonly involved in the plasticity of organisms' developmental responses to environmental conditions [9][10][11][12]. Such high variability in the size of organisms has long inspired scientific debate [13][14][15][16], mainly because the size achieved at maturity is a fundamental determinant of Darwinian fitness [17,18], with far-reaching consequences for physiological and ecological processes, e.g., the energy budget, mortality, competition, and niche breadth [13,17]. Mechanistically, this variability involves changes in cell numbers and size as well as the amount of extracellular components, but we usually do not know the role of each of these mechanisms or their fitness consequences [8,13,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such high variability in the size of organisms has long inspired scientific debate [13][14][15][16], mainly because the size achieved at maturity is a fundamental determinant of Darwinian fitness [17,18], with far-reaching consequences for physiological and ecological processes, e.g., the energy budget, mortality, competition, and niche breadth [13,17]. Mechanistically, this variability involves changes in cell numbers and size as well as the amount of extracellular components, but we usually do not know the role of each of these mechanisms or their fitness consequences [8,13,18]. Emerging evidence suggests that cell size does not remain constant, changing both with the developmental environment [12,[19][20][21][22][23] and over evolution, differentiating populations and species [19,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%