2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1978-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of family conversation on health care practices in Ethiopia: a propensity score matched analysis

Abstract: BackgroundMaternal and newborn mortality rates in Ethiopia are among the highest in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of deaths take place during childbirth or within the following 48 h. Therefore, ensuring facility deliveries with emergency obstetric and newborn care services available and immediate postnatal follow-up are key strategies to increase survival. In early 2014, the Family Conversation was implemented in 115 rural districts in Ethiopia, covering about 17 million people. It aimed to reduce maternal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participating in at least one family conversation during pregnancy was associated with the use of PNC services. The effect of family conversation on early PNC visits was also documented in earlier studies in Ethiopia [ 28 , 29 ]. A similar study suggests that family conversations could potentially play a crucial role in changing a family’s behaviors towards better maternal and newborn care practices through dismantling family healthcare decision-making barriers discussing birth preparedness and essential newborn practices with family members together [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participating in at least one family conversation during pregnancy was associated with the use of PNC services. The effect of family conversation on early PNC visits was also documented in earlier studies in Ethiopia [ 28 , 29 ]. A similar study suggests that family conversations could potentially play a crucial role in changing a family’s behaviors towards better maternal and newborn care practices through dismantling family healthcare decision-making barriers discussing birth preparedness and essential newborn practices with family members together [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The effect of family conversation on early PNC visits was also documented in earlier studies in Ethiopia [ 28 , 29 ]. A similar study suggests that family conversations could potentially play a crucial role in changing a family’s behaviors towards better maternal and newborn care practices through dismantling family healthcare decision-making barriers discussing birth preparedness and essential newborn practices with family members together [ 28 ]. Another intervention study on community-based collaborative approach involving HEWs and community health development agents illustrates that having two to four community maternal and newborn health family meetings during pregnancy with a family member was associated with the receipt of PNC [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The consideration of MWHs as part of birth preparedness planning was very low, suggesting a need to better promote MWHs as a means to overcome distance and transport barriers. Family Conversations, for instance, conducted by HEWs to engage families to better prepare for delivery [ 48 ] would be a useful platform to broaden conventional delivery plans which traditionally focus on saving money for transport and calling ambulances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies were conducted in East Africa (Kenya (n = 3) [20][21][22], Uganda (n = 2) [23,24] Tanzania (n = 2) [9,25], Eritrea (n = 1) [26], and Ethiopia (n = 1) [27]). Two were conducted in Southern Africa (Zambia (n = 1), [28], and Lesotho (n = 1) [29]), and one in West Africa (Mali) [30].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studies Included In the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies used a quasiexperimental design [20, 22-25, 30, 32-34]. Four studies were cross-sectional [21,29,31,35]. In terms of assessment methods, two studies used mixed methods [21,31].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studies Included In the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%