Effects of exposure to anionic surfactants (SDBS and SDS) on nitrogen removal of aerobic denitrifier

Abstract

In order to explain the effect of anionic surfactants on aerobic denitrification in the urban river, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) were added in aerobic denitrifier and the efficiency of nitrogen removal, microbial mechanisms, and enzyme activity was investigated in this study. The results showed that the total nitrogen (TN) and the nitrate nitrogen (NO − 3 − N) removal efficiency decreased as an increase of SDBS concentration. In contrast, 59.70% of the TN and 75.12% of NO − 3 − N were removed as the SDBS was 0 mg/L (Control). When SDBS was 200 mg/L (SDBS-200), the removal efficiency of TN and NO − 3 − N was reduced to 4.92% and 4.00%, respectively. However, the denitrification efficiency was significantly accelerated when the concentration of SDS increased, except for 200 mg/L treatment (SDS-200). As the SDS increased from 0 to 100 mg/L (SDS-100), the removal efficiency of TN and NO − 3 − N raised from 59.70% to 70.8% and from 75.12% to 85.08%, respectively. The community structure of aerobic denitrifiers was significantly affected in the SDBS and SDS. While the Cupriavidus and Achromobacter were dominant genera in the group of Control (39.59%, and 42.45%) and SDS-100 (44.40% and 34.86%), the relative abundance of Cupriavidus increased to 84.06% and 59.45% in the group of SDBS-200 and SDS-200, respectively. Enzyme activity assays proved that the nitrite reductase (NiR) relative activity of aerobic denitrification was suppressed by both SDBS and SDS. The increase in the SDS concentrations (from 0 to 50 mg/L) resulted in sharp growth of the nitrate reductase (NR) relative activities (from 100% to 146.86%). These findings demonstrated that SDBS and SDS affected aerobic denitrification efficiency of the aerobic denitrifiers by changing its microbial community structure and enzyme activity. © 2020 Water Environment Federation • Practitioner points • SDS strengthened aerobic denitrification at low concentration, but the aerobic denitrifiers were inhibited in SDBS. • The variation of community structure played a vital role in the aerobic denitrification system. • The enzyme activity was seriously affected by SDBS and SDS. • Microorganisms and enzyme activity were synergistically involved in the aerobic denitrification.

Effect of sulfamethoxazole on nitrate removal by simultaneous heterotrophic aerobic denitrification

“…On Day 21, at a dosage of 10 mg/L SMX, a rise in nitrate removal led slight accumulation of nitrite. The accumulation of nitrite during aerobic denitrification was due to inhibition of aerobic denitrifiers by antibiotic toxicity (Yin et al, 2020).…”

Assessing the Effect of Anionic Surfactants on the Performance of Enhanced In-sewer Purification with Porous Media

“…2, was expected due to the perceived negative effects of surfactants on sewer biofilm activity. The presence of SDBS in high concentrations has been reported to result in a decrease in microbial activity through the direct interaction between SDBS and microorganisms [17]. Brandt et al [18] reported that microbial inhibition by surfactants occurred through the interaction of SDBS with the lipid cell membrane, causing permeability changes in the microbial cell.…”

Experimental Study on the Hydraulic Performance of the Horizontal Main Drain of Building Drainage Systems Affected by Surfactants Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate and Alkyl Ethoxylate-9

“…In the field of wastewater treatment, Li et al [14] found in 2020 that SDBS can affect the biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency in high-salinity wastewater treatment. YIN C et al [15] also found that surfactants can have a serious impact on denitrification-related bacteria in wastewater treatment in the same year. In the field of coal dust, J Meng et al [16] found in 2021 that surfactants can also affect the dispersion of coal dust.…”