2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of experimentally induced cyanobacterial blooms on crustacean zooplankton communities

Abstract: SUMMARY 1. Large in situ enclosures were used to study the effects of experimentally induced cyanobacterial blooms on zooplankton communities. A combination of N and P was added to shallow (2 m) and deep enclosures (5 m) with the goal of reducing the TN : TP ratio to a low level (∼5 : 1) to promote cyanobacterial growth. After nutrient additions, high biomass of cyanobacteria developed rapidly in shallow enclosures reaching levels only observed during bloom events in eutrophic lakes. 2. In the shallow enclosur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
104
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
11
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bloom-forming cyanobacteria generally exist as massive or filamentous colonies. Among the many features associated with large colonial forms of cyanobacteria include quick vertical migration (Kromkamp and Walsby, 1990), effective uptake of phosphorus (Shen and Song, 2007), protection from ultraviolet radiation (Sommaruga et al, 2009) and invulnerability to grazers (Ghadouani et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2008). These features are closely related to the ecological advantages of bloom-forming cyanobacteria over unicellular species in water ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bloom-forming cyanobacteria generally exist as massive or filamentous colonies. Among the many features associated with large colonial forms of cyanobacteria include quick vertical migration (Kromkamp and Walsby, 1990), effective uptake of phosphorus (Shen and Song, 2007), protection from ultraviolet radiation (Sommaruga et al, 2009) and invulnerability to grazers (Ghadouani et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2008). These features are closely related to the ecological advantages of bloom-forming cyanobacteria over unicellular species in water ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is contrasting evidence in the literature on the extent to which grazing by zooplankton can control the development of cyanobacterial blooms. For instance, the effect of Daphnia, a key grazer in standing waters, on Microcystis biomass is debated, as Microcystis may strongly suppress the growth of Daphnia (Ghadouani et al, 2003), while other studies have provided evidence that Daphnia may suppress developing Microcystis blooms depending on initial conditions and history (Christoffersen et al, 1993;Sarnelle, 2007). Probably, environmental conditions are also important for the outcome of these interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyanobacteria are widely considered low quality food for zooplankton, particularly for Daphnia sp., due to their filamentous or colonial structure, nutritional inadequacy and toxin production (e.g., Arnold, 1971;Haney, 1987;Lampert, 1987;Reinikainen et al, 1994;Gulati and DeMott, 1996;Repka, 1996Repka, , 1997DeMott, 1999;DeMott et al, 2001;Rohrlack et al, 2001;Ghadouani et al, 2003). In particular, the main cyanobacteria species recorded in Lake Vela during the study period (A. flosaquae), have been reported as toxic species, able to produce toxins (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%