2002
DOI: 10.1006/ecss.2001.0937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Experimental Sediment Resuspension on a Coastal Planktonic Microbial Food Web

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of coastal osmotrophic communities to these different events may therefore be expected to show some regularities. In the first place, an almost immediate signal in biomass parameters may occur after any of these perturbations, due to the input of microorganisms either from runoff (de Madariaga et al 1992) or from benthos resuspension (Garstecki et al 2002). However, this signal is expected to be transient, as organisms are diluted or sink to the bottom.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of coastal osmotrophic communities to these different events may therefore be expected to show some regularities. In the first place, an almost immediate signal in biomass parameters may occur after any of these perturbations, due to the input of microorganisms either from runoff (de Madariaga et al 1992) or from benthos resuspension (Garstecki et al 2002). However, this signal is expected to be transient, as organisms are diluted or sink to the bottom.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the response was species-specific among bacterivorous suspension feeders (several scuticociliates and a Euplotes, the latter being inhibited in strong flow), suggesting that flow regime could affect their relative population growth rates and hence community structure. Sediment resuspension, another flowinduced process, has been shown experimentally to enhance growth rates and intensify trophic interactions throughout the sedimentary protistan community, including diatoms, flagellates, ciliates, and rhizopods (Garstecki & Wickham 2001, Garstecki et al 2002. Shimeta et al (2002Shimeta et al ( , 2003 documented periodic resuspension at Stations RH and WI, with various taxa of ciliates and diatoms displaying different thresholds of flow strength for resuspension.…”
Section: Community Structure In Relation To Flow and Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow strength affects feeding rates of subtidal ciliates (Shimeta et al 2001) and the species structure of ciliate communities on sandy shores (Lucchesi & Santangelo 1997). Resuspension stimulates growth and trophic interactions of unicellular sedimentary protists (Garstecki & Wickham 2001, Garstecki et al 2002, and the fact that benthic diatoms and ciliates each show species-specific resuspension dynamics (Lucas et al 2001, Shimeta et al 2002 also suggests that flow regime can influence populations differentially and possibly impact community structure. Furthermore, resuspension dynamics can differ between sites in ways suggesting an interaction between flow regime and grain size (Shimeta et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processes that occur during sediment resuspension have also been shown to be related to the presence of blooms of phytoplankton in certain environments (Hansson et al, 1994;Huisman et al, 1999;Garstecki et al, 2002). For example, phytoplankton blooms occur mainly during the low mixing periods in neap tides of South San Francisco Bay, a large marine embayment (Cloern, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%