2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of experimental configuration on the detection threshold of hysteretic elastic nonlinearity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and where v(t) denotes a corrupting term containing the additive noise and the parts of the examined signal that are not captured by the first term in (17). We may thus estimate the parameters detailing the examined mode using LS aŝ…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and where v(t) denotes a corrupting term containing the additive noise and the parts of the examined signal that are not captured by the first term in (17). We may thus estimate the parameters detailing the examined mode using LS aŝ…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-linear ultrasound spectroscopy (NRUS) techniques are based on the measurement of resonance frequencies at different amplitudes and have shown promising results for the detection of distributed damage in concrete [14,15,3,16]. These methods can sense a large volume of a micro-cracked sample and are not too sensitive to the position of the sensors [17]. In the single-mode resonance spectroscopy (SIMONRAS) technique, the output vibration amplitude is measured while sweeping over an interval comprising a resonance frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, if conditions and are satisfied, QPC allows discriminating between the structural nonlinearity that would be quadratic phase coupled and other experimental spurious sources such as ambient and equipment noise that, instead, might not be. Indeed, let us assume that the spectrum of the measured signal X ( ω ) is expressed as a superposition of the nonlinear structural response U ( ω ) and random contributions due to the effects of the experimental noise, η a ( ω ), and the electronic noise, η e ( ω ), : X()ω=U()ω+ηa()ω+ηe()ω=U(),,,ωmωnϕmϕn+kana(),ωqϕq+kene(),ωpϕp where n a ( ω q , ϕ q ) and n e ( ω p , ϕ p ) are random variables of constant amplitude k a and k e . Since generally the subscripts q , p ≠ m , n , both environmental and experimental noise do not allow for QPC.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Landau's nonlinear classical theory and Eq. , the standard second order nonlinear parameter β can be obtained as a solution of the nonlinear elastodynamic wave equation via a first order perturbation theory as follows : β()boldrmPω2P()ω1 where P ( ω 2 ) is the magnitude of the power spectral density associated with the second harmonic frequency component and r m = x m î + y m ĵ is the position vector of the m (1 ≤ m ≤ M ) receivers located on top surface of the composite panel. The parameter β ( r m ) is herein introduced to quantify the second nonlinear elastic response of a structure subjected to harmonic excitation.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This field has not been considered by the researchers yet and it is a very important subject. As an example, Idjimarene et al [31] state that the nonlinear indicator is dependent on the position of the receiver, and it is sensitive to the level of noise. The main contribution of this paper states a semi-analytical approach to eliminate the dependence of experimental settings on β measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%