1991
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1310019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of exogenous growth hormone on growth and body composition in genetically selected mice

Abstract: The effects of exogenous GH on growth and body composition were investigated in lines of mice selected for high or low body weight (P-lines) or high or low body fat (F-lines). Mice from all lines were given daily injections of recombinant bovine GH or a placebo for 21 days from 4 weeks old. They were killed and various organ weights measured. There was no consistent effect of GH on organ weights. In all lines of mice the rate of weight gain and final weight increased in response to GH. In both lines selected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to the use of GH transgenes to stimulate growth rate is the administration of exogenous GH. Postweaning treatment with recombinant bGH in lines of mice divergently selected for lean body mass and percentage body fat, respectively, increased growth rate in all lines, but no genetic‐background by GH‐treatment interaction was found on a log scale (B ootland et al 1991; H astings et al 1993). The authors' interpretation of this finding was that sensitivity to GH had not been modified by selection, and sensitivity or numbers of hormone receptors had not changed over the course of selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative to the use of GH transgenes to stimulate growth rate is the administration of exogenous GH. Postweaning treatment with recombinant bGH in lines of mice divergently selected for lean body mass and percentage body fat, respectively, increased growth rate in all lines, but no genetic‐background by GH‐treatment interaction was found on a log scale (B ootland et al 1991; H astings et al 1993). The authors' interpretation of this finding was that sensitivity to GH had not been modified by selection, and sensitivity or numbers of hormone receptors had not changed over the course of selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A mutated bGH‐analogue transgene produced mice almost as large as normal bGH transgenic mice, but the mutated bGH mice had a higher fat content than non‐transgenic controls (K napp et al 1994). No effect of exogenous bGH on fat content was reported in lines of mice divergently selected for lean body mass and fat percentage, respectively (B ootland et al 1991; H astings et al 1993). Transgenic sheep carrying the same oMT1a‐oGH construct as in the mice of this study had a reduced fat content (N ancarrow et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin and selection of the mouse lines used in this experiment (the ' P ' lines) have been described by Sharp et al (1984) and Beniwal et al (1992 a) and the introduction of the lit gene by Bootland et al (1991 a). Briefly, the lines were derived from a crossbred base and selected for 20 generations on estimated lean mass at 10 weeks of age (using an index of body weight and gonadal fatpad weight), and for a further 23 generations on body weight at 10 weeks of age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%