Objective:To compare the effects of inspiratory resistance training (IRT) and isocapnic hyperpnea (IH) versus incentive spirometry (placebo) on respiratory function, voice, and quality of life in individuals with motor complete tetraplegia. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 24 individuals with traumatic, motor complete (AIS A) tetraplegia (C5-C8), 6 to 8 months post injury, were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. They completed either 90 repetitions of IRT, 10 minutes of IH, or 16 repetitions of placebo training in 32 supervised training sessions over 8 weeks. Before and after the training period, the following tests were performed: bodyplethysmography, inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, subjective breathing parameters using the visual analogue scale (VAS), voice measurements, and an adapted SF-12 quality of life questionnaire. A Friedman test and Cohen's effect sizes for IRT and IH versus placebo were calculated for differences between pre-and posttraining values. Results: Compared to placebo training, IRT showed high effect sizes for inspiratory muscle strength (d = 1.19), VAS values of "cleaning the nose" (d = 0.99), and the physical component of subjective quality of life (d = 0.84). IH compared to placebo training showed only medium and low effect sizes. The Friedman analysis showed a significant effect for IRT versus placebo on inspiratory muscle strength (P = .030). Neither all other parameters of respiratory function nor voice measurements, subjective breathing parameters, or quality of life were significantly improved by one of the tested training methods. Conclusion: In individuals with motor complete tetraplegia, inspiratory muscle strength can be improved by IRT. Therefore, IRT is advantageous compared to IH for this group of patients and during the first year post injury. Key words: breathing exercises, quality of life, respiratory muscles, spinal cord injuries R espiratory complications are still the leading cause of death in individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI).1 Haisma and colleagues showed that the risk of pulmonary infections for individuals with complete lesions is 3.5 times higher than for individuals with incomplete lesions.2 The increased risk for individuals with motor complete tetraplegia seems to result from the loss of respiratory muscle innervation and the consecutive loss of lung volume. 3,4 First studies have shown positive effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function 5,6 and respiratory complications. However, review articles on respiratory muscle training in individuals with SCI showed that most studies were of low methodological quality and that there are not yet enough data to show a clear effect of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, respiratory complications, or quality of life. 8,9 Additionally, there exist different methods for respiratory muscle training in clinical practice, which can roughly be scaled in respiratory resistance (strength) and respiratory muscle endurance training methods. To our knowledge, ther...