Effects of European colonization on indigenous ecosystems: post‐settlement changes in tree stand structures in Eucalyptus–Callitris woodlands in central New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Aim There has been considerable debate about pre-settlement stand structures in temperate woodlands in south-eastern Australia. Traditional histories assumed massive tree losses across the region, whereas a number of recent histories propose that woodlands were originally open and trees regenerated densely after settlement. To reconcile these conflicting models, we gathered quantitative data on pre-settlement stand structures in Eucalyptus-Callitris woodlands in central New South Wales Australia, including: (1) tree density, composition, basal area and canopy cover at the time of European settlement; and (2) post-settlement changes in these attributes.Location Woodlands dominated by Eucalyptus species and Callitris glaucophylla, which originally occupied approximately 100,000 km 2 in central New South Wales, Australia.Methods We recorded all evidence of pre-settlement trees, including stumps, stags and veteran trees, from 39 relatively undisturbed 1-ha stands within 16 State Forests evenly distributed across the region. Current trees were recorded in a nested 900 m 2 quadrat at each site. Allometric relationships were used to estimate girth over bark at breast height, tree basal area, and crown diameter from the girth of cut stumps. A post-settlement disturbance index was developed to assess correlations between post-settlement disturbance and attributes of pre-settlement stands. ResultsThe densities of all large trees (> 60 cm girth over bark at breast height) were significantly greater in current stands than at the time of European settlement (198 vs. 39 trees ha )1 ). Pre-settlement and current stands did not differ in basal area. However, the proportional representation of Eucalyptus and Callitris changed completely. At the time of settlement, stands were dominated by Eucalyptus (78% of basal area), whereas current stands are dominated by Callitris (74%). On average, Eucalyptus afforded 83% of crown cover at the time of settlement. Moreover, the estimated density, basal area and crown cover of Eucalyptus at the time of settlement were significantly negatively correlated with post-settlement disturbance, which suggests that these results underestimate pre-settlement Eucalyptus representation in the most disturbed stands.Main conclusions These results incorporate elements of traditional and recent vegetation histories. Since European settlement, State Forests have been transformed from Eucalyptus to Callitris dominance as a result of the widespread clearance of pre-settlement Eucalyptus and dense post-settlement recruitment of Callitris. Tree densities did increase greatly after European Journal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd settlement, but most stands were much denser at the time of settlement than recent histories suggest. The original degree of dominance by Eucalyptus was unexpected, and has been consistently underestimated in the past. This study has greatly refined our understanding of post-settlement changes in woodland stand structures, and will strengthen the foundation for management poli...

Long term thinning and logging in Australian cypress pine forest: Changes in habitat attributes and response of fauna

“…Early recognition of their value as a timber resource also facilitated retention of these forests in the Brigalow Belt, with large tracts being reserved for selective logging (Dargavel and Kowald, 2001). Cypress pine is highly fire-sensitive, and a number of studies report shifts in cypress pine stem densities since European settlement predominantly in response to changed fire regimes (Norris et al, 1991;Lunt et al, 2006;Fensham, 2008a;Cohn et al, 2011;Whipp et al, 2012). Consequently, in cypress pine forest timber production areas, much management effort is directed towards the exclusion of fire to protect the timber resource.…”

River red gum and white cypress forests in south-western New South Wales, Australia: Ecological history and implications for conservation of grassy woodlands

“…3). Lunt et al (2006) used physical evidence to investigate changes in vegetation and suggested that the pre-European woodlands east from Griffith were dominated by eucalypts rather than cypress, however, this is not consistent with the explorers reports (Table 3). Cypress stands were preferentially cleared since clearing was easier and they had more arable soils, whilst stands of box on heavy soils were relatively unaffected by clearing (Keith, 2004).…”

“…In contrast, modern red gum or cypress stands would certainly obstruct parties with pack horses and bullock teams (e.g. Lunt et al, 2006 Fig. 3).…”

“…Riverine forests invaded formerly treeless plains and grassy woodlands became dense forests or scrubs (Croft et al, 1997;Lunt et al, 2001;Lunt et al, 2006). The new box, cypress and red gum forests with more than 100 large (>20 cm dbh) trees ha À1 (Forestry Commission of NSW, 1985;Lunt et al, 2006;Gibbons et al, 2008) are not representative of natural conditions.…”

“…Forests were mostly dominated by eucalypts and had large trees and open grassy understoreys (Tables 3-5, Mitchell, 1839). The old 'forests' with about 30 trees ha À1 (Wallis, 1878;Donovan, 1997;Lunt et al, 2006) were woodlands in current terms, as were most myall scrubs (Croft et al, 1997;Keith, 2004). Scrubs contained small or poorly formed trees and were often dense (Tables 2 and 3).…”