2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of equivalent beam element on the in-plane shear performance of 3D stochastic fibrous networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To theoretically tackle this issue, theoretical mechanical models based on process–structure–performance relationships have been developed, including the strength-hardening model, porous bodies model, and equivalent beam model . The aforementioned model may describe the mechanical characteristics of MNs at different failure regions on a macrolevel and is consistent with the mechanical behavior of MNs in their respective work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To theoretically tackle this issue, theoretical mechanical models based on process–structure–performance relationships have been developed, including the strength-hardening model, porous bodies model, and equivalent beam model . The aforementioned model may describe the mechanical characteristics of MNs at different failure regions on a macrolevel and is consistent with the mechanical behavior of MNs in their respective work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies invariably proceed by constructing a high fidelity finite element model of a particular configuration of CFN and comparing it to a nicely constructed experiment. Long et al [14] specializes to finite element beam models which is in principle more efficient and Zhang et al [15] studied homogenization of representative volume elements of fiber networks. From a bottom-up modeling perspective, peridynamics modeling of CFN [16,17] reproduced qualitatively striking aspects of fracture but ultimately were limited to relatively small simulation sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%