2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00330-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of environmental and maternally derived methylmercury on the embryonic and larval stages of walleye (Stizostedion vitreum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mercury is a contaminant of particular concern due to its prevalence in aquatic systems, known toxicity, and ability to be transferred from a female to her offspring [1][2][3]. The highly toxic organic form, methylmercury (MeHg), readily bioaccumulates and generally comprises a high percentage of the Hg transferred from female to offspring [4][5][6]. Moreover, exposure to maternally transferred Hg may be more detrimental than dietary or environmental exposure because offspring are subjected to contaminants during sensitive developmental stages [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury is a contaminant of particular concern due to its prevalence in aquatic systems, known toxicity, and ability to be transferred from a female to her offspring [1][2][3]. The highly toxic organic form, methylmercury (MeHg), readily bioaccumulates and generally comprises a high percentage of the Hg transferred from female to offspring [4][5][6]. Moreover, exposure to maternally transferred Hg may be more detrimental than dietary or environmental exposure because offspring are subjected to contaminants during sensitive developmental stages [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two important changes are as follows: i) the decrease in dissolved oxygen levels (Hecky et al, 1994;Wanink et al, 2001) and ii) an increase of heavy metal concentrations in the lake (Kishe and Machiwa, 2003). Both can interfere with the development of fish embryos (Yediler and Jacobs, 1995;Weis and Weis, 1995a,b;Latif et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological anomalies are common in reared fish but rare in natural populations from undisturbed ecosystems (Dahlberg, 1970;Daoulas et al, 1991;Da Cunha and Antunes, 1999) and many authors have hypothesized a relationship between skeletal anomalies and environmental conditions (Dahlberg, 1970;Bengtsson, 1979Bengtsson, , 1988Karr, 1981;Sloof, 1982;Bengtsson et al, 1985Bengtsson et al, , 1988Hardig et al, 1988;Mayer et al, 1988;O'Connor and Huggett, 1988;Westeinhagen et al, 1988;Haya, 1989;Weigand et al, 1989;Weis and Weis, 1989;Carls and Rice, 1990;Fausch et al, 1990;Lindsejöö and Thulin, 1992;Oberdoff and Hughes, 1992;Whittle et al, 1992;Von Westernhagen and Dethlefsen, 1997;Kirchhoff et al, 1999). Consequently, skeletal anomalies have been recently used as indicators or biomarkers of pollution stress in fish (Savvaitova et al, 1995;Svanberg, 1996;Svanberg and Bengtsson, 1996;Wilson and Tillitt, 1996;Ewald, 1999;Karen et al, 2001;Latif et al, 2001;Pastva et al, 2001;Klumpp et al, 2002;Haga et al, 2003) as terata are considered as permanent biomarkers of toxicity, i.e. they are utilized to reliably identify and evaluate the impact of selenium on fish populations (Lemly, 1997(Lemly, , 2002 or in environmental impact studies by the Swedish Environmental Protection Board ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%