“…Morphological anomalies are common in reared fish but rare in natural populations from undisturbed ecosystems (Dahlberg, 1970;Daoulas et al, 1991;Da Cunha and Antunes, 1999) and many authors have hypothesized a relationship between skeletal anomalies and environmental conditions (Dahlberg, 1970;Bengtsson, 1979Bengtsson, , 1988Karr, 1981;Sloof, 1982;Bengtsson et al, 1985Bengtsson et al, , 1988Hardig et al, 1988;Mayer et al, 1988;O'Connor and Huggett, 1988;Westeinhagen et al, 1988;Haya, 1989;Weigand et al, 1989;Weis and Weis, 1989;Carls and Rice, 1990;Fausch et al, 1990;Lindsejöö and Thulin, 1992;Oberdoff and Hughes, 1992;Whittle et al, 1992;Von Westernhagen and Dethlefsen, 1997;Kirchhoff et al, 1999). Consequently, skeletal anomalies have been recently used as indicators or biomarkers of pollution stress in fish (Savvaitova et al, 1995;Svanberg, 1996;Svanberg and Bengtsson, 1996;Wilson and Tillitt, 1996;Ewald, 1999;Karen et al, 2001;Latif et al, 2001;Pastva et al, 2001;Klumpp et al, 2002;Haga et al, 2003) as terata are considered as permanent biomarkers of toxicity, i.e. they are utilized to reliably identify and evaluate the impact of selenium on fish populations (Lemly, 1997(Lemly, , 2002 or in environmental impact studies by the Swedish Environmental Protection Board ...…”