1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1146-609x(97)80015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen fertilisation on yield of Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other studies have also found that despite significant effects on plant growth, nutrient addition did not enable greater responsiveness to elevated CO 2 (Chiariello and Field 1996;Lloyd and Farquhar 1996;Körner et al 1997;Reich et al 2001aReich et al , 2001b. But a noteworthy number of studies found increasing magnitudes of growth stimulation in response to elevated CO 2 as N supply increased (Hebeisen et al 1997a;Wand et al 1999;Poorter and PØrez-Soba 2001). The lack of agreement across studies, and the fact that the CO 2 response of some species appears to be independent of N supply, represents an ongoing major uncertainty in CO 2 research and suggests that mechanisms independent of N limitation may be important in determining the ability to respond to increased CO 2 concentrations or may reflect species-specific differences in response to CO 2 concentration and their interactions with the nutrient status of each respective system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several other studies have also found that despite significant effects on plant growth, nutrient addition did not enable greater responsiveness to elevated CO 2 (Chiariello and Field 1996;Lloyd and Farquhar 1996;Körner et al 1997;Reich et al 2001aReich et al , 2001b. But a noteworthy number of studies found increasing magnitudes of growth stimulation in response to elevated CO 2 as N supply increased (Hebeisen et al 1997a;Wand et al 1999;Poorter and PØrez-Soba 2001). The lack of agreement across studies, and the fact that the CO 2 response of some species appears to be independent of N supply, represents an ongoing major uncertainty in CO 2 research and suggests that mechanisms independent of N limitation may be important in determining the ability to respond to increased CO 2 concentrations or may reflect species-specific differences in response to CO 2 concentration and their interactions with the nutrient status of each respective system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Decreased RA could be caused by reduced Rubisco content or by decreased specificity of Rubisco (Aranjuelo et al 2005;Korner 2006;Gutschick 2007). It has been well documented that the availability of mineral nutrients, particularly N, can greatly modify plant growth responses to eCO 2 (Diaz et al 1993;Hebeisen et al 1997;Luo et al 2004;Reich et al 2006). The negative effect of eCO 2 on net photosynthesis in C 4 species at HS, including F v /F m , might also be related to a decreased N concentration, which could result in the impaired synthesis of photosynthetic enzymes and protecting systems; such damage would not be compensated for by decreased photorespiration at eCO 2 , as in C 3 species (Bunce 2000;Aranjuelo et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that availability of mineral nutrients, particularly N, can greatly modify growth responses to elevated CO 2 (Diaz et al 1993;Field et al 1992;Hebeisen et al 1997;Korner 2003b;Luo et al 2004;McCarthy et al 2006;Niklaus et al 1998;Oren et al 2001;Rastetter et al 1997;Reich et al 2006;Zanetti et al 1997). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%