1999
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.60.3547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of electron correlation, relativity, and nuclear structure on hyperfine constants ofBe+andF6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed the method described as a systematic expansion of configuration set [28,29], in which configuration state functions of a particular parity and symmetry are generated by substitutions from reference configurations to an active set of orbitals. The active set is systematically increased until the convergence of the calculated value of A is obtained.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed the method described as a systematic expansion of configuration set [28,29], in which configuration state functions of a particular parity and symmetry are generated by substitutions from reference configurations to an active set of orbitals. The active set is systematically increased until the convergence of the calculated value of A is obtained.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were calculations performed for Li and Be + with the relativistic analog of the MCHF procedure, the multiconfigurational Dirac-Fock (MCDF) method [10,11,12]. The computational accuracy of these relativistic calculations turns out be lower than that of the best nonrelativistic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [80,81] constitute the first applications of the CAS-MCDHF model in atomic theory. In both cases the systems under study were very light (i.e.…”
Section: Complete Active Space For Light Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases an attempt was made to extrapolate the systematic expansions of the active set, so as to achieve the level of approximation which might be called an MCDHF limit, bearing in mind that this concept is somewhat more fuzzy than its non-relativistic counterpart, and perhaps a "no-pair" MCDHF limit (see section IV) would be a better description. Within the limitations of the model (among several factors, the distribution of electromagnetic moments inside the nucleus (Bohr-Weisskopf effect [121]) constitutes the primary limitation of the accuracy of the calculations of atomic hyperfine structures; they have drawn much attention in recent years -see references [134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142] -but the fact is that these distributions are generally unknown) and bearing in mind that within the domain of light, neutral atoms non-relativistic methods have several advantages over fully relativistic Dirac-Hartree-Fock methods, the values obtained in papers [80] and [81] are nearly as accurate as the results obtained within the semi-relativistic HartreeFock [126] and Hylleraas models [25].…”
Section: Complete Active Space For Light Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%