The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2017.8366410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Electron and Proton Radiation on Perovskite Solar Cells for Space Solar Power Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] The radiation hardness of perovskite solar cells has been little investigated and is the subject of a few publications only. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In 2018, Miyasaka et al studied the radiation tolerance of perovskite solar cells composed of a mesoporous TiO 2 electron transport layer (ETL) and P3HT holes transport layer (HTL) to 1 MeV electrons and 50 keV protons and found that cells can survive to accumulated dose of 10 16 electrons cm À2 and 10 15 protons cm À2 , respectively. [14] For this study, P3HT was chosen as an HTL for its better thermal resistance compared with Spiro-OMeTAD, which is known to degrade at 80-100 C. P3HT showed robust radiation stability, but the power conversion efficiency (PCE) was rather low (4-5%) compared with state-of-the-art perovskite solar cells with Spiro-OMeTAD HTL (>20%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] The radiation hardness of perovskite solar cells has been little investigated and is the subject of a few publications only. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In 2018, Miyasaka et al studied the radiation tolerance of perovskite solar cells composed of a mesoporous TiO 2 electron transport layer (ETL) and P3HT holes transport layer (HTL) to 1 MeV electrons and 50 keV protons and found that cells can survive to accumulated dose of 10 16 electrons cm À2 and 10 15 protons cm À2 , respectively. [14] For this study, P3HT was chosen as an HTL for its better thermal resistance compared with Spiro-OMeTAD, which is known to degrade at 80-100 C. P3HT showed robust radiation stability, but the power conversion efficiency (PCE) was rather low (4-5%) compared with state-of-the-art perovskite solar cells with Spiro-OMeTAD HTL (>20%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation hardness of p-i-n MAPbI 3 (inverted-type) solar cells to proton irradiation was also investigated by two other groups. [11,13,17] Huang et al showed that 50 keV protons with fluence 10 12 cm À2 cause a significant degradation of the performance of inverted perovskite cells, but these cells can be restored with a vacuum annealing process. Lang et al showed that the cells exposed to 20 and 68 MeV proton irradiation from the substrate side could withstand proton dose up to 10 12 protons cm À2 without significant damages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another attractive characteristic of perovskites is their tolerance to ionizing radiation. Tests done at Caltech [51] and elsewhere [52], [53] have shown that while perovskites suffer some displacement damage in high radiation fields, the damage can be annealed out to return the device to its undamaged operating state. This eliminates the need for cover glass, greatly reducing the mass of the cells.…”
Section: Architecture Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, a few notable publications are investigating a wide range of energies, device architectures, perovskite compositions, and materials. [ 16–29 ] In 2015, and once again in 2018, Miyasaka et al showed that PSCs provide a much more robust radiation stable solar cell than their inorganic counterparts. In these publications, it was reported that PSCs utilizing a compact and mesoporous TiO 2 electron transport layer (ETL) and P3HT hole transport layer (HTL) are stable under an accumulated dose of 1 × 10 14 protons cm −2 for 50 keV protons and 1 × 10 16 electrons cm −2 for 1 MeV electrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%