2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of electro-negativity on the stability of topologically close-packed phase in high entropy alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of δ, ∆H mix , and Ω for the current alloy are listed in Table 3. In addition, the valence electron concentration (VEC) and Pauling electronegativity difference (∆χ) are also used to predict the formation of solid solution versus intermetallic phases in HEAs [42][43][44]. The VEC and ∆χ for multi-component alloys can be defined as:…”
Section: Phase Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of δ, ∆H mix , and Ω for the current alloy are listed in Table 3. In addition, the valence electron concentration (VEC) and Pauling electronegativity difference (∆χ) are also used to predict the formation of solid solution versus intermetallic phases in HEAs [42][43][44]. The VEC and ∆χ for multi-component alloys can be defined as:…”
Section: Phase Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where VEC is the average valence electron concentration; VEC i is the valence electron concentration of element i; ∆χ is the Pauling electronegativity difference; χ i is the Pauling electronegativity of element i [34]; c i , r i , and χ i are the atom fraction, radius, and electronegativity of the i-th element, respectively; and r a and χ a are the average radius and electronegativity of the elements in the alloys, respectively. Table 3 presents the corresponding values of δ, ∆H mix , ∆S mix , T mix , Ω, VEC, and ∆χ for the Al x CrFeNiV alloys (x = 0.3, and 0.5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…163,204,252,253,255,258,[263][264][265][266]271 138,272 have used VEC alongside compositional considerations to predict σ formation in HEAs, while others have compared instances of ordered phase formation (including topologically close-packed phases, TCPs) against the average value of the d-orbital energy level 262,273 and Dx. 274 It has been suggested that Dx it is also an indicator of elemental segregation on casting. 257 DS mix is not particularly useful differentiator, since it is uniformly high for HEAs.…”
Section: Phase Prediction and Alloy Selection In Heasmentioning
confidence: 99%