2015
DOI: 10.1002/mus.24530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of electrical stimulation pattern on quadriceps isometric force and fatigue in individuals with spinal cord injury

Abstract: These findings suggest that for the same initial forces the VFT pattern is less fatiguing than CFT and that when combining train types, VFT should be used first.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e ., from a constant frequency trains (CFT, where six 200 s square wave pulses separated by 70 ms were used) to a double frequency train (DFT, where a train of pairs of closely spaced pulses (doublets, 5ms) separated by longer intervals were used)) demonstrated improvements in fatigue resistance [ 14 ], whereas administration of CFT and DFT separately were less optimal [ 21 ]. In addition, during paralyzed quadriceps’ strength training, Deley et al, [ 20 ] verified that variable frequency train (VFT, where a train identical to the CFT were used, except that the first 2 pulses were separated by 5 ms) stimulation pattern and VFT followed by CFT generated less fatiguing contractions. Taken together, these findings suggest that the frequency modification of different stimulation trains offsets rapid muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e ., from a constant frequency trains (CFT, where six 200 s square wave pulses separated by 70 ms were used) to a double frequency train (DFT, where a train of pairs of closely spaced pulses (doublets, 5ms) separated by longer intervals were used)) demonstrated improvements in fatigue resistance [ 14 ], whereas administration of CFT and DFT separately were less optimal [ 21 ]. In addition, during paralyzed quadriceps’ strength training, Deley et al, [ 20 ] verified that variable frequency train (VFT, where a train identical to the CFT were used, except that the first 2 pulses were separated by 5 ms) stimulation pattern and VFT followed by CFT generated less fatiguing contractions. Taken together, these findings suggest that the frequency modification of different stimulation trains offsets rapid muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low ‘take-up’ of FES interventions within conventional clinical practice, should not be assumed to indicate any lack of medical benefits, since scientific understanding of electrical stimulus-induced fatigue in the clinical population is still rudimentary [ 6 , 20 ]. Previous studies, that have sought to improve fatigue-resistance during FES therapy, have investigated the effects of size of stimulating electrodes or their position over some specific locations (such as anatomical landmarks and motor points) [ 16 ], modulation of neuromuscular stimulation parameters [ 21 ], optimization of the mode and frequency of exercise [ 22 ] and biofeedback-controlled stimulation [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stimulation strategy would increase the total force output during a given exercise session that could be of interest more particularly for FES rehabilitation procedures. Nevertheless, this preliminary study was conducted on able-bodied individuals and the efficiency of such stimulation procedure should be investigated in patients such as spinal cord injured and in combination with other stimulation pattern for training optimization [ 40 ]. Indeed, able-bodied and those with spinal cord injury widely differed in muscle composition and function and cardiovascular function, for example [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its application for prolonged stimulation is limited due to fast occurring muscular fatigue. Several methods can be used to slow down the fatigue (Deley et al 2015). Variations in stimulation frequency, as well as the use of distributed and asynchronous stimulation, significantly increase the effective duration of sustained electrical stimulation (Malešević et al 2010;Popović et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%