1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90060-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
191
3
10

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
9
191
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, evidence of a cost to mating in that mating appears to reduce longevity (Pitafi, 1991;Gilburn & Day, in preparation). A similar relationship has been found in Drosophila melanogaster (Partridge et at., 1987;Fowler & Partridge, 1989). There may also be an energy cost associated with rejecting males, particularly large ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is, however, evidence of a cost to mating in that mating appears to reduce longevity (Pitafi, 1991;Gilburn & Day, in preparation). A similar relationship has been found in Drosophila melanogaster (Partridge et at., 1987;Fowler & Partridge, 1989). There may also be an energy cost associated with rejecting males, particularly large ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It is therefore paid only by RR females and results in a proportion, m, of females failing to produce progeny. As in other insect species (Partridge et al, 1987;Fowler & Partridge, 1989;Rowe et a!., 1994), mating in seaweed flies carries a cost; Pitafi (1991) found that females allowed unlimited matings died younger than did virgin females. Furthermore, a positive correlation exists between the frequency of rejection and female longevity (Gilburn & Day, in preparation).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, an experimental increase in diet quality in field crickets, Teleogryllus commodus, resulted in reduced male longevity but increased reproductive effort (Hunt et al, 2004). Similar trade-offs have been found in other taxa: when reproduction is experimentally limited, survival often increases (Partridge et al, 1987;Tatar et al, 1993;Ellers et al, 2000;Hosken, 2001;McKean and Nunney, 2001). Although our study does not provide direct evidence of a trade-off between fecundity and immunity, previous measurements on the same inbred lines and outbred population of G. sigillatus have demonstrated that inbred individuals have lower reproductive investment than outbred colony individuals (St John JM and Sakaluk SK, unpublished data).…”
Section: Sn Gershman Et Almentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Here we found that males among species usually differed in both intercepts and slopes, whereas females differed primarily in the slope, or rate of aging. This contrast among sexes may reflect how costs of reproduction have evolved in females relative to males (Partridge et al ., 1987). Future studies will be needed to address this question more directly.…”
Section: Discussion Demographymentioning
confidence: 99%