2010
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Earth-Fixed vs Head-Fixed Targets on Static Ocular Counterroll

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that OCR gain is dependent on age, viewing distances, and target complexity, 19 as well as whether the target is head fixed or earth fixed. 20 Using an earth-fixed complex target at a distance of 1 m that has been shown to elicit higher gain in normal subjects, we recorded the eye movements of 18 patients with skew deviation and 18 normal participants by scleral search coil. 21 We found that mean OCR gain was reduced by 45% in patients as compared with normal controls, and that OCR gains were asymmetric between eyes and between torsional directions in 90% of patients.…”
Section: Skew Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that OCR gain is dependent on age, viewing distances, and target complexity, 19 as well as whether the target is head fixed or earth fixed. 20 Using an earth-fixed complex target at a distance of 1 m that has been shown to elicit higher gain in normal subjects, we recorded the eye movements of 18 patients with skew deviation and 18 normal participants by scleral search coil. 21 We found that mean OCR gain was reduced by 45% in patients as compared with normal controls, and that OCR gains were asymmetric between eyes and between torsional directions in 90% of patients.…”
Section: Skew Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 We provided further evidence to confirm its existence by demonstrating that the magnitude of ocular counterroll responses is dependent on the age of subjects, viewing distance, target characteristics, and whether or not the target moves simultaneously with the head. 44,45 The ocular tilt reaction is a pathological synkinetic triad of skew deviation, ocular torsion, and head tilt. It has been attributed to lesions in the vestibular organ and its nerve, and central connections within the brainstem or cerebellum that asymmetrically disrupt the utriculo-ocular pathway.…”
Section: Distinguishing From Trochlear Nerve Palsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differences between our experiment and that of Chandrakumar et al (2010) are the visual stimulation and the performed task. The participants in the latter experiment had to fixate a cross centered on a wide field grid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, the torsion is less important when both the head and the tablet are tilted: when the counteroll is in the opposite direction to the visual orientation of the tablet. In an experiment by Chandrakumar et al (2010), cyclotorsion was measured during head tilt for several head roll values. The subjects were viewing a grid which was either stationary or moving along with the head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%