1964
DOI: 10.2307/3895539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Early Spring Burning on Yields of Native Vegetation

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 2b). Such increases in primary production after fire are not typically observed in Mediterranean-climate annual grassland systems, such as this one, where litter accumulation is low and fires are typically of low intensity and severity (Launchbaugh 1964;Hurlbert 1969) but are more typical of tallgrass prairie systems (Abrams et al 1986;Briggs and Knapp 1995). Even at the JRGCE, when plant biomass was analyzed over the entire growing season (as opposed to the first peak in April 2004), no differences were observed between burned and unburned plots (Henry et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1, 2b). Such increases in primary production after fire are not typically observed in Mediterranean-climate annual grassland systems, such as this one, where litter accumulation is low and fires are typically of low intensity and severity (Launchbaugh 1964;Hurlbert 1969) but are more typical of tallgrass prairie systems (Abrams et al 1986;Briggs and Knapp 1995). Even at the JRGCE, when plant biomass was analyzed over the entire growing season (as opposed to the first peak in April 2004), no differences were observed between burned and unburned plots (Henry et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several early studies reported reduced ANPP or cover of desired grass species post-fire, leading to the widespread perception that fire is detrimental in the shortgrass steppe (Bragg, 1978;Dwyer and Pieper, 1967;Hopkins et al, 1948;Launchbaugh, 1964;Trlica and Schuster, 1969). Perhaps due to the negative perceptions of burning, the effects of fire in the shortgrass steppe and mixed-grass prairie have received only sporadic attention over the last sixty years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percent change in aboveground net primary productivity ((burned À unburned)/unburned) in one, two, or three or more years after fire as a function of mean annual precipitation. Data from Brockway et al (2002), Dix (1960), Dwyer and Pieper (1967), Engle and Bultsma (1984), Gartner et al (1978), Hopkins et al (1948), Launchbaugh (1964), Morrison et al (1986), Owensby and Launchbaugh (1977), Pfeiffer and Steuter (1994), Shay et al (2001), Steuter (1987), Trlica and Schuster (1969). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…topography, soil, fauna (insects, herbivores), together with herbaceous plants [57] [60], can restrict the encroachment of woody plant (trees, shrubs), release nutrients bound up in organic matter, accelerating the rate of decomposition in the soil, so as to maintain the establishment and the stability of grasslands [6] [57] [61]. Descriptive studies [62] [63] show that fire occurrences decrease herbaceous production for one to three years. Meanwhile, herbaceous response is influenced strongly by precipitation.…”
Section: Impact Of Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Launchbaugh [63] examined a spring wildfire in shortgrass prairie when the soil moisture was low, and found that fire caused short-term declines in plant biomass. It took three growing seasons for a burned grass community to return to a level comparable to the unburned state.…”
Section: Coupling With the Climatementioning
confidence: 99%