1979
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90416-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of early malnutrition on tail pinch-induced behavior of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Context modulates the behavioural response to tail-pinch in that the response is influenced by the sort of stimuli present in the environment, by the rat's physiological and motivational state, and by the animal's experiential history (Szechtman, 1980). For instance, tail-pinch behaviour takes the form of eating when food pellets are available Levine & Morley, 1981) but turns into gnawing in the presence of wooden blocks (Koob et al, 1976) or maternal behaviour when there are rat pups in the vicinity (Sherman, 1972;Szechtman et al, 1977) or increased bar-pressing for brain stimulation when there exists the opportunity to obtain rewarding brain stimulation (Katz et al, 1980); however, tail-pinch does not induce drinking of water (Antelman et al, 1976;Mufson et al, 1976;Marques et al, 1979) and rarely rearing or grooming (Picone & Hall, 1979;Szechtman & Hall, 1980;Szechtman, 1980), suggesting some specificity to the tail-pinch stimulus. Motivational states also influence the response to tail-pinch.…”
Section: Not Magic Bullets But Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Context modulates the behavioural response to tail-pinch in that the response is influenced by the sort of stimuli present in the environment, by the rat's physiological and motivational state, and by the animal's experiential history (Szechtman, 1980). For instance, tail-pinch behaviour takes the form of eating when food pellets are available Levine & Morley, 1981) but turns into gnawing in the presence of wooden blocks (Koob et al, 1976) or maternal behaviour when there are rat pups in the vicinity (Sherman, 1972;Szechtman et al, 1977) or increased bar-pressing for brain stimulation when there exists the opportunity to obtain rewarding brain stimulation (Katz et al, 1980); however, tail-pinch does not induce drinking of water (Antelman et al, 1976;Mufson et al, 1976;Marques et al, 1979) and rarely rearing or grooming (Picone & Hall, 1979;Szechtman & Hall, 1980;Szechtman, 1980), suggesting some specificity to the tail-pinch stimulus. Motivational states also influence the response to tail-pinch.…”
Section: Not Magic Bullets But Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral testing of rats reared by dams who were maintained on an 8070 protein diet during pregnancy and lactation has been limited. However, Frankova and Barnes (1968) have reported that rats with inadequate protein early in life manifest a variety of behavioral disorders, including stereotyped movements and a failure to delay or extinguish fixed conditioned responses; and Picone and Hall (1977) have found that such animals also differ in their responses to tail pinch. In addition, Stem, Resnick, and Morgane (1976) reported a deficit in retention (but not in acquisition) on a response altemation task, although Hall (1983) observed no differences in learning a radial maze when factors such as running speed were equated, A review of the neurobiological and behavioralliterature on the effects of 8% casein diets has been provided by Morgane et al (1978).…”
Section: Drain Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%