2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of early childhood intervention on fertility and maternal employment: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a randomized study of a home visiting program implemented in Germany for low-income, first-time mothers. A major goal of the program is to improve the participants' economic self-sufficiency and family planning. I use administrative data from the German social security system and detailed telephone surveys to examine the effects of the intervention on maternal employment, welfare benefits, and household composition. The study reveals that the intervention unintentionally decr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preference for mental health (α 2 ) is identified by variation in the degree to which individuals are willing to consume costly treatments across the distribution of mental health states. 24 Preferences for employment are identified by the popularity of working part-time and full-time given the amount of income that the model predicts for these types of employment and preferences for consumption of income (determined by the CRRA parameter). Because treatment alternatives have a pecuniary cost, the CRRA parameter is identified by variation in treatment choices across the income distribution.…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preference for mental health (α 2 ) is identified by variation in the degree to which individuals are willing to consume costly treatments across the distribution of mental health states. 24 Preferences for employment are identified by the popularity of working part-time and full-time given the amount of income that the model predicts for these types of employment and preferences for consumption of income (determined by the CRRA parameter). Because treatment alternatives have a pecuniary cost, the CRRA parameter is identified by variation in treatment choices across the income distribution.…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calculate the CEV separately for different ages and for two permanent income groups: high-income individuals who have an earnings index e j above the median level of their age group, and low-income individuals who have an earnings index below the median. 24 As shown in Figure 8(a), the reform benefits individuals of all ages in both 22 Direct government spending is held fixed throughout the experiments. 23 We calculate this as lifetime utility reform −utility from bequests benchmark lifetime utility benchmark −utility from bequests benchmark…”
Section: No Income Taxes On Social Security Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target group were pregnant first-time mothers and/or their partners who received social welfare or unemployment benefits, had an income that qualified them for social welfare benefits, or had excessive debt. Sandner (2015) concludes that the program decreased maternal employment, but increased life satisfaction and fertility rates. He argues that the program increased mothers' knowledge of welfare spending.…”
Section: Individual and Household Determinants 311 Partners And Houmentioning
confidence: 99%