2015
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20151240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of drought and fire on bird communities of the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprodTo order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent drought events are thought to have been exacerbated by climate change, where warming due to anthropogenic activity has increased the likelihood of extreme drought (Williams et al, 2015). Coastal sage scrub (CSS) is a biodiversity hotspot that hosts multiple endemic species and is prone to adverse drought effects (George et al, 1992; Patten and Rotenberry, 1999; Bolger et al, 2005; Albright et al, 2010; McCreedy et al, 2015; Myers et al, 2019). Drought within CSS can have potentially drastic effects on this habitat, given that only 10% of the original range of CSS still exists (Atwood, 1993; McCaull, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent drought events are thought to have been exacerbated by climate change, where warming due to anthropogenic activity has increased the likelihood of extreme drought (Williams et al, 2015). Coastal sage scrub (CSS) is a biodiversity hotspot that hosts multiple endemic species and is prone to adverse drought effects (George et al, 1992; Patten and Rotenberry, 1999; Bolger et al, 2005; Albright et al, 2010; McCreedy et al, 2015; Myers et al, 2019). Drought within CSS can have potentially drastic effects on this habitat, given that only 10% of the original range of CSS still exists (Atwood, 1993; McCaull, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is a growing body of work on the effects of drought on birds that breed in arid and semiarid habitats. For example, periods of drought or atypically low rainfall have led to lower levels of species richness and abundance in birds (albright et al 2010), reduction of birds' reproductive rates (McCreedy et al 2015), reproductive failure of passerines (Bolger et al 2005), a decline of over 60% in density of grassland birds (George et al 1992), short-term declines in both resident and migratory species (Bock and Bock 1999), and smaller clutch sizes of the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica; Patten and rotenberry 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%