2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dopamine indirect agonists and selective D1-like and D2-like agonists and antagonists on cocaine self-administration and food maintained responding in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
126
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
14
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this dose of d-amphetamine administered during self-administration sessions was behaviorally active (e.g., increased ratings of Like Drug and Good Effects, increased heart rate and blood pressure), it approximates the threshold dose to produce reliable behavioral effects (Chait, 1993), suggesting that even higher doses might be necessary to modify d-amphetamine self-administration. There is an extensive pre-clinical literature that has demonstrated that higher pretreatment doses are more effective at decreasing stimulant self-administration than low doses (e.g., Barrett et al, 2004;Harrod et al, 2001;Newman and Beardsley, 2006). Consistent with this notion, the dose of d-amphetamine administered in the present study (i.e., 15 mg) was not effective at modifying drug taking behavior when administered to stimulant-dependent patients Shearer et al, 2001;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this dose of d-amphetamine administered during self-administration sessions was behaviorally active (e.g., increased ratings of Like Drug and Good Effects, increased heart rate and blood pressure), it approximates the threshold dose to produce reliable behavioral effects (Chait, 1993), suggesting that even higher doses might be necessary to modify d-amphetamine self-administration. There is an extensive pre-clinical literature that has demonstrated that higher pretreatment doses are more effective at decreasing stimulant self-administration than low doses (e.g., Barrett et al, 2004;Harrod et al, 2001;Newman and Beardsley, 2006). Consistent with this notion, the dose of d-amphetamine administered in the present study (i.e., 15 mg) was not effective at modifying drug taking behavior when administered to stimulant-dependent patients Shearer et al, 2001;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A number of nonhuman laboratory studies have demonstrated that acute stimulant pretreatment can attenuate the reinforcing effects of stimulant drugs (e.g., Barrett et al, 2004). Because either an enhancement or reduction in drug taking was a possible outcome, the doses of d-amphetamine that were selected were expected to engender moderate drug taking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon stabilization of responding, defined as three consecutive sessions with less than a 20% variation and no increasing or decreasing trend in responding, rats were transferred to a multi-component, 5-dose procedure. Under this procedure, increasing doses of cocaine (0, 0.032, 0.1, 0.32, and 1.0 mg/kg/inj) or methylphenidate (0, 0.01, 0.032, 0.1, and 0.32 mg/kg/inj) were available during five sequential 25 min components (eg, Barrett et al, 2004;Hiranita et al, 2009). Components were initiated by the non-contingent delivery of the unit dose of the drug available for responding, and separated by a 2-min inter-component interval (ICI) during which time the house light was illuminated and responding had no scheduled consequence.…”
Section: Self-administration Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This schedule was increased to an FR3 (5 days), followed by an FR5 (5 days), an FR10 (3 days), and finally a progressive ratio (1 day). Increments in the progressive ratio (PR) schedule within session used the formula 5 × EXP (0.2 × infusion number)-5 [28,29]. Similar to those studies, we replaced the first six values (1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12) with 3, 6, and 10, and then continued with the progression provided by the equation.…”
Section: Self-administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%