1972
DOI: 10.2307/3149596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Distraction and Commitment on the Persuasiveness of Television Advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case that information processing is constrained because people are under a cognitive load, under time pressure, or distracted, it is harder to engage in such reflection (Baron, Baron, & Miller, 1973;Gilbert, Krull, & Malone, 1990). This implies that social labeling messages may have more impact when they are accompanied by some form of distraction (Bither, 1972;Kumkale & Albarracín, 2004). Campbell and Kirmani (2000) observed that when their participants were cognitively "busy" (i.e., when they had to perform other simultaneous and cognitively demanding tasks), they were more prone to judge a salesperson giving a promotional talk as sincere and thus be sensitive to his arguments.…”
Section: Distraction Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case that information processing is constrained because people are under a cognitive load, under time pressure, or distracted, it is harder to engage in such reflection (Baron, Baron, & Miller, 1973;Gilbert, Krull, & Malone, 1990). This implies that social labeling messages may have more impact when they are accompanied by some form of distraction (Bither, 1972;Kumkale & Albarracín, 2004). Campbell and Kirmani (2000) observed that when their participants were cognitively "busy" (i.e., when they had to perform other simultaneous and cognitively demanding tasks), they were more prone to judge a salesperson giving a promotional talk as sincere and thus be sensitive to his arguments.…”
Section: Distraction Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A locational map, for example, may be included within bulletin board design to attract visitors to the sign. Although this strategy may increase attention to posted low-impact messages, it is also possible that the use of an attractant may reduce attention if visitors are distracted by the map (Bither, 1972).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dieser Befund wurde bereits in einem betriebswirtschaftlichen Kontext repliziert. Bither (1972) belegt, dass ein französischer Akzent das Verständnis der Werbebotschaft erschwert und in der Folge deren Erinnerung beeinträchtigt. Grundsätzlich ist also davon auszugehen, dass sprachliche Besonderheiten einen Vampireffekt auslösen, indem sie zwar die Aufmerksamkeit des Zuhörers steigern, die kognitive Aktivität aber auf die Dekodierung der Sprachbesonderheit und nicht auf die Verarbeitung der Botschaft lenken.…”
Section: Erinnerungunclassified
“…Allerdings brachte die empirische Überprüfung dieser Hypothese widersprüchliche Befunde hervor (Nelson et al 1985;Silverthorne u. Mazmanian 1975;Ware u. Tucker 1974). Auch die betriebswirtschaftliche Studie von Bither (1972) liefert keinen Beleg für die aus der Theory of Distraction hergeleitete Vermutung, dass der Akzent als ablenkendes Gestaltungsmerkmal die nachgelagerte Einstellungsänderung des Rezipienten positiv beeinflusst. Anders als erwartet, erwies sich der französische Akzent nicht als geeignet, die Einstellung der Versuchspersonen gegenüber dem beworbenen Automobil zu verbessern.…”
Section: Aktivierung Von Argumentenunclassified