1980
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90877-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of disruption of hippocampal function on learning of a go/no-go discrimination in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this would not account for the effect observed with similar cortical stimulation in a go-no-go task when learning of that task was, in fact, significantly facilitated. In discussing this latter finding, Livesey et al (1980) suggested it might be due to an alerting or a potentiating effect, particularly as Walker and his co-workers had found that lesions in a similar cortical region led to depressed performance in a go T no-go alternation task (Means, Walker, & Isaacson, 1970;Walker, Means, & Isaac-son, 1970). The significance of these cortical effects is thus still not resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this would not account for the effect observed with similar cortical stimulation in a go-no-go task when learning of that task was, in fact, significantly facilitated. In discussing this latter finding, Livesey et al (1980) suggested it might be due to an alerting or a potentiating effect, particularly as Walker and his co-workers had found that lesions in a similar cortical region led to depressed performance in a go T no-go alternation task (Means, Walker, & Isaacson, 1970;Walker, Means, & Isaac-son, 1970). The significance of these cortical effects is thus still not resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable results from small lesions noted by Douglas (1967) may well have been due to differentiation of function within the hippocampus. Using localized electrical stimulation to disrupt hippocampal function, Livesey and co-workers demonstrated differential effects in the learning of both simultaneous and go-no-go discrimination tasks (Livesey, 1975;Livesey, Meyer, & Smith, 1980). The effects of stimulation varied both with the location stimulated (CA1 or dentate gyms of the dorsal hippocampus in the rat) and with the temporal location in the stimulus-response sequence at which the stimulation was applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second point at which the lesion might have affected performance was during the reversal phase of the experiment. Many experiments have shown that rats with hippocampal lesions tend to perseverate, to respond on the basis of original training conditions when those conditions have been changed (e.g., Douglas, 1972; Livesey & Meyer, 1975; Livesey, Meyer, & Smith, 1980). However, the lesion animals in this experiment clearly did not do that.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%