2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dispersed broadleaved and aggregated conifer tree retention on ground beetles in conifer plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2019, Yamanaka et al. 2021). Changes in the taxon‐based measures for ground beetle assemblages will evidently reflect carabids' functional role in the forest ecosystems due to the fact that their functional traits are highly connected with their taxonomic identity (Magura 2017, Magura and Lövei 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2019, Yamanaka et al. 2021). Changes in the taxon‐based measures for ground beetle assemblages will evidently reflect carabids' functional role in the forest ecosystems due to the fact that their functional traits are highly connected with their taxonomic identity (Magura 2017, Magura and Lövei 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within the framework of biodiversity and conservation studies in managed forests, species composition, richness, alpha diversity indices, and abundance are the simplest measures for biodiversity, based on the species taxonomic identity of the individuals (Magura 2017). Previous studies revealed that species composition have changed the most, while changes in species richness and abundance among forestry treatment were equivocal, mostly connected to the annual variation (Heikkala et al 2016, Koivula et al 2019, Yamanaka et al 2021. Changes in the taxon-based measures for ground beetle assemblages will evidently reflect carabids' functional role in the forest ecosystems due to the fact that their functional traits are highly connected with their taxonomic identity (Magura 2017, Magura andL€ ovei 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(https://japanesebeetles.jimdofree.com/). Hori (2001Hori ( , 2003Hori ( , 2012; however, this species commonly occurs in forests, and was categorized as a forest-dependent species in previous studies (Kaizuka et al 2020;Yamanaka et al 2021). Thus, we treated this species as a forest-dependent species.…”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific name of each species was in accordance with Suzuki (2022). Carabid species are categorised into forest and non-forest species according to the literature (Hori, 2001(Hori, , 2003(Hori, , 2012Yamanaka et al, 2021). Silphid species (Silpha perforata) are categorised as forest species according to Katakura et al (1986).…”
Section: Effects Of the Removal Process On Sampled Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitfall trapping is one of the most widely used techniques for ground invertebrate sampling (Henderson & Southwood, 2016; Woodcock, 2005). As such, pitfall trap sampling has been used in various studies of ground‐dwelling beetles, including the examination of their regional community and habitat preferences (Jouveau et al, 2019; Niemela & Halme, 1992) and the anthropogenic impact on this group (Koivula et al, 2019; Yamanaka et al, 2021). However, the abundance sampled using pitfall traps is determined through the sampling process, which is influenced by several factors, including the sampling design and targeted site‐ and species‐specific characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%