2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dispersal and environmental heterogeneity on the replacement and nestedness components of β‐diversity

Abstract: Traditionally metacommunity studies have quantified the relative importance of dispersal and environmental processes on observed β-diversity. Separating β-diversity into its replacement and nestedness components and linking such patterns to metacommunity drivers can provide richer insights into biodiversity organization across spatial scales. It is often very difficult to measure actual dispersal rates in the field and to define the boundaries of natural metacommunities. To overcome those limitations, we revis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
122
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…that spatial isolation among habitat patches increases nestedness (Bender et al 2017, Gianuca et al 2017. Similar results have been found in empirical studies showing e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…that spatial isolation among habitat patches increases nestedness (Bender et al 2017, Gianuca et al 2017. Similar results have been found in empirical studies showing e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Both turnover and nestedness contributed to the total dissimilarity, although their relative importance varied depending on lake type, mirroring findings for other aquatic biota (Brendonck, Jocqué, Tuytens, Timms, & Vanschoenwinkel, ; Gianuca, Declerck, Lemmens, & De Meester, ; Tonkin, Stoll, Jähnig, & Haase, ). β turnover was much higher in HA lakes compared with other lake types (Figure c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Our results also suggest that ecological processes related to habitat dispersal and filtering shape heterogeneous communities, (Gianuca et al, ; Shurin, ; Spasojevic, Copeland, & Suding, ), which can form different species community through species replacement along disturbance gradients. Environmental factors were the major drivers of variation in species diversity, however, it should be acknowledged that combining deterministic (i.e., habitat filtering) and stochastic processes should most effectively explain variations among vegetation communities (Myers et al, ; Qian et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Species would select suitable environmental conditions where dispersal is favorable within heterogeneous environments, which can increase the importance of species replacement. However, in homogenous environments, the pattern of nestedness‐resultant components would be erased when dispersal increased, which may affect species assemblages (Gianuca et al, ). That pattern is suggestive of desertification promoting community divergence in heterogeneous environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%