2009
DOI: 10.1094/php-2009-0401-01-rs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Diseases on Soybean Yields in the United States 1996 to 2007

Abstract: Research must focus on management of diseases that cause extensive losses, especially when funds for research are limited. Knowledge of yield suppression caused by various soybean diseases is essential when prioritizing research. The objective of this project was to compile estimates of soybean yield suppression due to diseases in the USA from 1996 to 2007. The goal was to provide information to help funding agencies and scientists prioritize research objectives and budgets. Yield suppression due to individual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
337
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
337
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…SCN is the most economically limiting pathogen for soybean, causing billions of dollars of yield losses annually in the United States alone (Wrather and Koenning, 2009). Major efforts in soybean breeding and biotechnology are focused on the incorporation of desirable Rhg1 alleles and on the continued discovery of new and better sources of SCN resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SCN is the most economically limiting pathogen for soybean, causing billions of dollars of yield losses annually in the United States alone (Wrather and Koenning, 2009). Major efforts in soybean breeding and biotechnology are focused on the incorporation of desirable Rhg1 alleles and on the continued discovery of new and better sources of SCN resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCN is found in all major soybean-growing states in the United States and cannot feasibly be removed (Niblack, 2005). Because the primary control strategies for SCN are crop rotation and planting resistant varieties, significant attention has been focused on the identification, development, and use of soybean germplasm that exhibits resistance to SCN (Diers et al, 1997;Concibido et al, 2004;Brucker et al, 2005b;Wrather and Koenning, 2009;Kim et al, 2010aKim et al, , 2011. The Rhg1 (for Resistance to Heterodera glycines) locus, sometimes in combination with Rhg4, makes the greatest contribution to resistance in the vast majority of the commercially utilized soybean cultivars that exhibit SCN resistance (Caldwell et al, 1960;Matson and Williams, 1965;Webb et al, 1995;Li et al, 2004;Brucker et al, 2005b;Tylka et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many oomycete species are destructive plant pathogens, including the potato late blight pathogen that caused the Irish potato famine, Phytophthora infestans, the Sudden Oak Death pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum, and the soybean root and stem rot pathogen Phytophthora sojae (Erwin and Ribiero, 1996). P. sojae alone causes $200 to $300 million in annual soybean (Glycine max) losses in the US and around $1 to $2 billion in losses per year worldwide (Wrather and Koenning, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It causes diseases on several agronomic crops, ornamentals, and forestry species (González García, Portal Onco, & Rubio Susan, 2006). This pathogen causes reduction in soybean yields worldwide, at quantities up to 11.5 and 26.1 thousand metric tonnes in northern of United States and in Canada, respectively (Wrather et al, 2010;Wrather & Koenning, 2006). In Brazil, this pathogen is responsible for the pre and post-emergence damping-off and also for aerial blight of soybean (Fenille, Souza, & Kuramae, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%