2011
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Direct Instruction on the Acquisition of Prepositions by Students With Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract: Some students with intellectual disabilities require explicit instruction of language skills, including preposition use; however, little is known about effective ways to teach preposition use to this population. This study examined direct instruction (DI) to teach students to use and respond to prepositions. Results indicated that DI was an effective way to teach prepositions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Students with severe disabilities have demonstrated that they can learn meaningful literacy and comprehension skills (e.g., Coyne et al, 2012;Mims et al, 2012;Spooner et al, 2014); however, we also must find ways to teach these students to generalize these skills to new situations and materials (Stokes & Baer, 1977). Consistent with previous research (Hicks et al, 2011;R. H. Horner et al, 1986;Knight, Spooner et al, 2013), the present study demonstrated that teaching multiple examples and non-examples can be a successful strategy for teaching early literacy skills that generalize to new material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Students with severe disabilities have demonstrated that they can learn meaningful literacy and comprehension skills (e.g., Coyne et al, 2012;Mims et al, 2012;Spooner et al, 2014); however, we also must find ways to teach these students to generalize these skills to new situations and materials (Stokes & Baer, 1977). Consistent with previous research (Hicks et al, 2011;R. H. Horner et al, 1986;Knight, Spooner et al, 2013), the present study demonstrated that teaching multiple examples and non-examples can be a successful strategy for teaching early literacy skills that generalize to new material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the seminal piece, Stokes and Baer (1977) suggested several approaches, including training sufficient exemplars. This method has been used in instruction for students with severe disabilities in the form of teaching multiple exemplars (Hicks, Bethune, Wood, Cooke, & Mims, 2011;R. H. Horner, Eberhard, & Sheehan, 1986;Knight, Spooner, Browder, Smith, & Wood, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for students to understand a concept, it is imperative that they understand not only what it is, but also what it is not. For instance, Hicks, Bethune, Wood, Cooke, and Mims (2011), taught prepositional phrases to students with ID using direct instruction along with examples and non-examples. Results demonstrated that all students were able to use the prepositions in the correct context after training (e.g., this is over, this is not over).…”
Section: Universal Design For Learning (Udl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two other studies, Hicks et al (2011) and Hicks, Rivera, and Wood (2015) taught expressive and receptive use of prepositions to five elementary students with mild to moderate intellectual disability and deficits in expressive and receptive language. A multiple-baseline design across behaviors, replicated across participants, was used to determine the effectiveness of a DI sequence and script (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991) on the acquisition of prepositions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instruction for both studies utilized a model-test procedure, which uses examples and nonexamples and various materials to enhance generalization (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Hicks et al (2011) utilized one-on-one instruction, while Hicks et al (2015) incorporated smallgroup instruction. Both studies demonstrated a functional relationship between the use of the DI format and the increase in prepositions for student participants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%