2021
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2021009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different weed cutting methods on physical and hydromorphological conditions in lowland streams

Abstract: Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of stream flooding events. In response, managing authorities may increase frequency and intensity of aquatic plant removal (weed cutting) to lower the water level in rivers possibly impairing physical and hydromorphological stream conditions. We studied 32 Danish lowland streams subjected to three different weed cutting practices, representing a gradient in weed cutting intensity, and uncut controls to compare physical and hydromorphological habitat qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited residence times under non-vegetated conditions (Fig. 6) decrease the likelihood for in-stream retention and may manifest as increased nitrate (Soana et al, 2019) and suspended sediment loads (e.g., Biggs et al, 2021;Rasmussen et al, 2021) to downstream water bodies after extensive cutting. In addition to decreasing in-stream retention, vegetation removal may increase erosion and mobilisation of e.g.…”
Section: Implications Of Vegetation Maintenance On Pollutant Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited residence times under non-vegetated conditions (Fig. 6) decrease the likelihood for in-stream retention and may manifest as increased nitrate (Soana et al, 2019) and suspended sediment loads (e.g., Biggs et al, 2021;Rasmussen et al, 2021) to downstream water bodies after extensive cutting. In addition to decreasing in-stream retention, vegetation removal may increase erosion and mobilisation of e.g.…”
Section: Implications Of Vegetation Maintenance On Pollutant Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, radical removal of aquatic vegetation may have unforeseen negative consequences when such services are reduced or no longer provided. However, the strength of the functional relations between vegetation and ecosystem services is not necessarily generalizable across ecosystems (Carpenter & Lodge, 1986; Hilt et al., 2017; Rasmussen et al., 2021). For example, some species are more efficient in nutrient uptake than others (Denny, 1972) and some species are more readily eaten by herbivores than others (Bakker et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, plant patches could be favourable in human-impacted rivers requiring environmental improvements but disallowing natural recovery or full restoration because of flood management, irrigation and drainage, hydropower, recreational activities or disease control (González del Tánago et al, 2021;Thiemer et al, 2021). To support these human purposes, vegetation is currently widely removed from river and floodplain areas as part of routine maintenance, with the ecologically harmful complete removal through cutting still common (Rasmussen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, plant patches could be favourable in human‐impacted rivers requiring environmental improvements but disallowing natural recovery or full restoration because of flood management, irrigation and drainage, hydropower, recreational activities or disease control (González del Tánago et al, 2021; Thiemer et al, 2021). To support these human purposes, vegetation is currently widely removed from river and floodplain areas as part of routine maintenance, with the ecologically harmful complete removal through cutting still common (Rasmussen et al, 2021). As an alternative, maintaining patchy vegetation presents an intermediate solution between naturally vegetated and fully cut conditions and potentially allows optimizing between flow conveyance and water quality targets by influencing the flow resistance, dispersion, residence times and retention of soluble and particulate matter as analysed by Bal et al (2011) and Verschoren et al (2017) regarding aquatic plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%