Effects of different types of laser etching versus phosphoric acid etching on shear bond strength of metal brackets to human enamel: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Golshah, Amin; Bagheri, Nila; Imani, Mohammad Moslem; Safari‐Faramani, Roya

doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2020.10.001

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10,13 In a study conducted by Golshah et al, high-volume suction reduced the aerosol particles generated during dental procedures by 44%. 14 However, this study examined only the dust particles produced during the aerosol-generating procedures, and not airborne droplets. [10][11][12][13] It is considered that the laser-assisted procedures, i.e., laser etching, can be regarded as non-aerosol-generating procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, laser etching does not preclude aerosol generating, as it requires water spray as a coolant after etching. 14 Therefore, the rationale of the present study is an urgent need for strict recommendations as to limiting orthodontic procedures to the provision of basic care to patients. Hence, the non-aerosol-generating bracket bonding protocol should be promptly developed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of bracket bond failure with the aerosol-generating and novel non-aerosol-generating bonding techniques during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among orthodontic patients: A retrospective cohort study

Qabool¹,

Sukhia²,

Fida³

et al. 2022

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, dentists must avoid the aerosol-generating procedures during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.Objectives. This study aimed to compare the rate of bracket bond failure with the aerosol-generating and non-aerosol generating bonding techniques. Material and methods.A retrospective cohort study was conducted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on a sample of 44 patients (880 teeth), equally divided into 2 groups: the conventional aerosol-generating bonding technique (ABT); and the novel non-aerosol-generating bonding technique (NABT). The rate of bracket survival and total number of bracket breakages in the 2 groups were assessed by means of the survival regression analysis. The influence of pre-treatment factors, such as the sagittal jaw relationship (ANB), the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), overjet, overbite, and upper and lower crowding, on the rate of bracket survival was also evaluated.Results. There was a statistically significant difference between ABT and NABT in terms of bracket survival. The mean bracket survival with ABT was 176.21 ±77.89 days and with NABT it was 162.53 ±83.34 days. The novel technique showed a hazard ratio of bracket survival of 2.99 as compared to the conventional method. There was a statistically significant influence of overjet on the rate of bracket survival (p = 0.010). The posterior segment had a higher rate of bracket failure as compared to the anterior segment in NABT, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, this difference was statistically non-significant in the case of ABT. Conclusions.There was an increased rate of bracket failure with NABT as compared to ABT. The rate of bracket breakages in the anterior quadrants was comparable for both bonding techniques.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of bracket bond failure with the aerosol-generating and novel non-aerosol-generating bonding techniques during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among orthodontic patients: A retrospective cohort study

Qabool¹,

Sukhia²,

Fida³

et al. 2022

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The findings obtained by Al Habdan et al (2021)17 were in contradiction with the current study. This can be explained by the use of only 4.5-watt average laser power output which is considered a high value for laser etching and in turn causes a loss of the unique etching pattern that usually appears after acid etching which prevents resin infiltration and consequentially reduces the bond strength values 17,26,29. The study findings as such recommend the limiting of the use of Er, Cr:YSGG Laseretching to the use of low to moderate level average output power to ensure the proper development of etching patterns that aid in the bonding process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Micro Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite Restorations to Er,Cr: YSGG Laser Treated Enamel Versus Conventional Acid Etching ( An In Vitro Study)

Shalaby

El-Kassas

Nabih

2023

Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The introduction of adhesive dentistry has spurred research into finding solutions for the facilitation of daily dental adhesive workflow to achieve a durable and reliable adhesive junction using newly introduced instruments & techniques in the dental field. Aim of the study: to evaluate the SBS to enamel surfaces treated using conventional acid etching compared to Er,Cr:YSGG laser at two average power outputs as well as in combination with each other.Materials and Methods: 50 human molars were used. The molars were embedded in acrylic blocks with their buccal surfaces facing upwards. Enamel was removed using an Isomet 4000 exposing superficial dentin and a surrounding enamel rim. The specimens were divided into five equal groups with ten samples in each group GI:Acid Etching, GII:3.5 watt Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, GIII:3.5 watt Er,Cr:YSGG + AE Laser, GIV:4.5 watt Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and GV:4.5 watt Er,Cr: YSGG Laser + AE. Universal microhybrid composite microcylinders were then bonded to the enamel rim using Tygon tubes which were then subjected to microshear bond testing using a universal testing machine and the SBS were recorded and tabulated. One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's Post-hoc tests were used to compare between the different groups. Results: The SBS values showed that values of GIV were similar to those obtained from GII and showed no statistical significance. Both groups, however, showed higher significant values than the remaining groups. Conclusion:Low average power output Er,Cr: YSGG laser has a beneficial effect in enhancing the bonding of etch and rinse adhesives to enamel.

show abstract

Application prospect of advanced oxidation technology in wet process phosphoric acid production

Liu

et al. 2022

Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of different types of laser etching versus phosphoric acid etching on shear bond strength of metal brackets to human enamel: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Comparison of bracket bond failure with the aerosol-generating and novel non-aerosol-generating bonding techniques during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among orthodontic patients: A retrospective cohort study

Comparison of bracket bond failure with the aerosol-generating and novel non-aerosol-generating bonding techniques during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among orthodontic patients: A retrospective cohort study

Micro Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite Restorations to Er,Cr: YSGG Laser Treated Enamel Versus Conventional Acid Etching ( An In Vitro Study)

Application prospect of advanced oxidation technology in wet process phosphoric acid production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About